1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
9966 [12]
2 years ago
5

In your own words, what is the Holocaust?

History
2 answers:
Galina-37 [17]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

there are many meaning but only one meaning that word means for me that is sacrifice

vfiekz [6]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

well there is 3 Definitions.

Explanation:

1: a sacrifice  consumed by fire

2: thorough destruction involving extensive loss of life especially through fire

3.usually the Holocaust: the mass slaughter of European civilians and especially Jews by the Nazis during World War II

You might be interested in
Briefly answer the following questions about the Magna Carta.
Korolek [52]

Magna Carta was originally created because of disagreements between Pope Innocent III, King John and his English barons about the rights of the King. The Magna Carta made the king denounced some of his rights , and made him realize he was not above the law. It also made him respect certain legal procedures , and realize his will was bound by law.

basically the magna carta was to secure the rights of the English aristocracy because they felt the king had usurped too much of their power. The magna carta actually went through quite a few different versions as kings would gradually ignore it then have to restate it at least in part to keep the nobility from revolting.
It did secure some freedoms such as rights of widows and wards, but its main focus was on the barons and their rights to hold courts and to approve of things going on in the kingdom such as taxes before the king could levy them.

 The magan Carta was the cornerstone for the future British Constitution. Many later attempts to draft constitutional forms of government, including the United States Constitution, trace their lineage back to the Magna Carta

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the relationship that existed between the dutch and the american indians living in north america
liq [111]
The Dutch pretty much exploited the Native Americans for their rich resources. The Native Americans resented the Dutch, and the Dutch looked down upon them because they considered the Native Americans to be "lower" and "an uncivilized people
6 0
3 years ago
Why is the concept "equality of all people" important in liberal democracy? Using complete sentences.
Crazy boy [7]

Equality for all people is important in a democracy because society functions better as a whole. If there were the rich people who were treated good and lower-class people who were not treated as fair as the others a lot of divisions would be created within the society. Divisions are not good for a proper functioning democratic government.

6 0
3 years ago
A. The Chesapeake and New England regions had many differences in development, but they also had similarities.
Kisachek [45]

A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is <u>B. The </u><u>Chesapeake </u><u>and </u><u>New England colonies </u><u>developed into</u><u> two distinct societies </u><u>based on their </u><u>geography</u><u>, </u><u>reasons </u><u>for </u><u>founding</u><u>, </u><u>economic </u><u>characteristics, and </u><u>relationships </u><u>with </u><u>American Indians.</u>

You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.

The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:

  • New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
  • New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.

Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.

We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.

<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.</em>

3 0
2 years ago
Read the quote.<br>which of the filling best describes what Addams meant by the settlement
Hunter-Best [27]

Immigration

i think ,not really sure

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following claims does al-Jabarti make about the French?
    11·1 answer
  • the representative of the reigning monarch of the United kingdom in both Australia and New Zealand is called the
    11·1 answer
  • What names were often given to pet dogs in ancient egypt?
    10·1 answer
  • The use of Shoguns and Samurai in Japanese history shows that in feudal Japan
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a major change experienced by European economies between the feudal period and the Commercial Revolut
    15·2 answers
  • Imagine you are an educated African American who moves to a northern city in the early 20th century. What might you do to establ
    8·1 answer
  • Why did many Mexican Americans form mutualistas?
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the Japanese economic miracle in the following areas in your own words: manufacturing, trade, and investment. What were
    7·1 answer
  • PLZZZ HELPPP
    12·1 answer
  • Why does folklore adapt over time?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!