The thing that can be easily noticed from the given interaction is that the speaker believes that women get preferential treatment and men do not.
He makes use of sarcasm to show his frustrations at how women are better treated than he is and he shows it through his words about the special treatment of women.
<h3>What is Preferential Treatment?</h3>
This refers to the way and manner in which a person is treated and is different from the way another is treated.
Hence, we can see that based on the given narration, the speaker talks about women and how they are helped into carriages, lifted over ditches, and have the best place everywhere.
Therefore, this shows that he believes that women get preferential treatment and men do not and this makes him very unhappy indeed.
Read more about preferential treatment here:
brainly.com/question/19425377
#SPJ1
Answer and Explanation:
The sentence shown in the question above represents an anecdote that shows how Euchner chose the witnesses for the trial. Accordingly, we can see that the criteria for this choice were not the best and do not present efficient reasons for it to be promoted. Accordingly, we can infer that Euchner did not have many options to choose from and that few people in the crowd were willing to testify.
Answer:
For example if a nail snaps it wouldn`t get into the nail techs eyes or mouth and if using nail polish they wont be breathing in chemicals
Explanation:
Answer:
More specific plz.............
Answer: Credit was not given
Explanation:
Plagiarism is when you take a person's work and pass it as your own work even if you took permission from its owner. Yes, even if a person gives you permission to use their work, you must not pass it as your own as this is plagiarism. You must credit the owner for the work.
I am unsure as to what forms of documentation the question speaks of but if that documentation relates to crediting the original owner for the work and it is missing, then the assignment is plagiarized because it is being passed along as your own even though it isn't. Even if this was not intentional, it is still plagiarism.
