To understand how to figure misplaced / dangling modifiers, we must first understand the message that the sentence is trying to convey to us. So let us take a look at the answer choices:
A. The veterinarian, found in the woods with a broken leg, offered to help the dog.
Was the veterinarian found in the woods with a broken leg? And if so, by whom? And if they had a broken leg, why are they concerned with helping the dog, who seems to be fine?
I do not think that answer A is the right choice, so let's move on.
B. Found in the woods, the veterinarian offered to help the dog with a broken leg.
Aha, at least now the dog has something that requires the help of the veterinarian. But why is the veterinarian being found in the woods? Is he some sort of hermit?
Probably not. Moving on!
C. Found in the woods with a broken leg, the veterinarian offered to help the dog.
Now, we are completely stumped as to what was found in the woods with a broken leg. Because it's unclear, we can dismiss it as an option choice.
D. The veterinarian offered to help the dog found in the woods with a broken leg.
NOW we're onto something! The dog was found in the woods with a broken leg, and the veterinarian offered to help. From the looks of things, this makes the most sense, and therefore, option D is the correct answer.
Hope that helped! =)
Answer:
Concept maps
Explanation:
A concept map is a general organizer that shows a central idea with its corresponding characteristics. Concept maps can take many different shapes and can be used to show any type of relationship that can be labeled.
Answer:
soooo pretty much
Explanation:
Passage A. The bureaucrat or good for nathing useless and shouldnt be worther to hold power O_Opowerr...
Passage B. that the bureaucrat was never kissed by an angel so there for is usless
provided by yours truly PIZZABOY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<span>President Ronald Regan’s goal
for this speech was to see the destruction of the Berlin Wall. However, it was not just the destruction of
the wall that President Ronald Regan was calling for. The call for the taking down of the wall was
really a call to end the Communist rule over East Germany. An end to Communist control over East Germany
would have seen the beginning of peace and stability across Eastern Europe,
which is what the goal really was by President Ronald Regan’s saying “Mr.
Gobachev, tear down this wall!”</span>
I think its one but I might be wrong
