The answer to this question is B
Respectful? i would assume so ??
The key details that best support the main idea in this paragraph are 1, 4 and 5
<h3>Explanation:
</h3>
The Brothers Grimm: Jacob Ludwig Karl and Wilhelm Carl, are German academics, philologists, and authors who published folklore.
Read the excerpt from "How the Grimm Brothers Saved the Fairy Tale."
Though it is impossible to clarify fully why certain tales were deleted or placed in footnotes in later editions, we do know that "Death and the Goose Boy” was omitted because of its baroque literary features; "The Strange Feast,” because of its close resemblance to "Godfather Death”; "The Stepmother,” because of its fragmentary nature and cruelty; and "The Faithful Animals,” because it came from the Siddhi-Kür, a collection of Mongolian tales. From the first edition in 1812/1815 to the final one in 1857, the Grimms received numerous versions of tales already in their collection and new tales from strangers, friends, and colleagues, and they often decided to replace one tale with another version, to delete some of the tales, or to include variants in their footnotes.
Which key details best support the main idea in this paragraph? Select three options.
- 1 “…’Death and the Goose Boy’ was omitted because of its baroque literary features;”
- 2 “From the first edition in 1812/1815 to the final one in 1857…”
- 3 “…‘The Strange Feast’ [was omitted] because of its close resemblance to ‘Godfather Death;’”
- 4 “’The Stepmother’ [was omitted] because of its fragmentary nature and cruelty;”
- 5 “…’The Faithful Animals’ [was omitted] because it came from the Siddhi-Kür….”
Learn more about
English literature: brainly.com/question/569870
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
C. whether a view is familiar or shocking does not determine if it is constitutional.
Explanation:
In other words, what the quote indicates is that the Constitution was created for people and, as everybody knows, people are different. In this way, opinions will not affect all individuals in the same way, and they are not responsible for deciding about the constitutionality of the statutes which represent these opinions.
