1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kramer
3 years ago
8

Do you think JFK was a good president? Why or why not

History
2 answers:
pashok25 [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: JFK was a good president

Explanation:

I think this because he lead the US to fight for the space race. He is the reason we went to the moon.

steposvetlana [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

i have two arguments. why he was a good president and why he was a bad one. you choose which one you want to choose.

- he was a bad president:

John F. Kennedy's glowing reputation is bound up with a bullet. Being murdered made him into a kind of political saint, and makes us forget that his years in the White House were a disaster. Why? Because he almost brought about the end of civilization as we know it.

Contrary to our sentimental image of JFK as a progressive visionary, he was actually a committed proponent of the Cold War and a foreign police hawk. Early in his tenure, Kennedy pushed forward with a secret plan to take down Fidel Castro's new regime in the nearby island of Cuba. This plan involved training, arming and deploying 1,500 Cuban exiles to mount a covert invasion of the island, inspire a popular uprising and overthrow Castro.

-he was a good president:

It's all too easy for us to sneer at Kennedy's stance as a Cold Warrior, all these decades later. But he was a man of his times, when paranoia and suspicion ruled the day. In the frightening ideological battle against the Soviets, nobody was immune to rash and half-baked ideas. In fact, the Bay of Pigs fiasco had actually been planned by President Eisenhower, not Kennedy, and simply been inherited by the Kennedy administration.

Yes, Kennedy chose to go ahead with the plan, but what president wouldn't have? Cuba was regarded as a genuine threat, a foothold for the Soviets right on America's doorstep. Kennedy HAD to do something. As Jim Rosenberger, author of The Brilliant Disaster, describes the dilemma over the Bay of Pigs plan: "[Kennedy] had a lot of doubts about it, a lot of concerns about it, but he never could figure out a way not to do it."

And as for the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy absolutely deserves credit for averting total global calamity. Barraged with conflicting opinions from military advisors - some of whom were pressing for the US to trigger war against the Soviets - Kennedy DID keep a cool head, and he DID make the right deal with the Soviets to steer the world away from a nuclear holocaust. It's sheer good luck we had him in the driving seat rather than someone who might have listened to bad advice and gone with a military response.

Explanation:

hope this helps!

~mina

You might be interested in
Which level of government can declare war on foreign Nations​
AveGali [126]

Answer: The Constitution of the United States divides the war powers of the federal government between the Executive and Legislative branches: the President is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces (Article II, section 2), while Congress has the power to make declarations of war, and to raise and support the armed forces (Article I, section 8). Over time, questions arose as to the extent of the President's authority to deploy U.S. armed forces into hostile situations abroad without a declaration of war or some other form of Congressional approval. Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to address these concerns and provide a set of procedures for both the President and Congress to follow in situations where the introduction of U.S. forces abroad could lead to their involvement in armed conflict.

Conceptually, the War Powers Resolution can be broken down into several distinct parts. The first part states the policy behind the law, namely to "insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities," and that the President's powers as Commander in Chief are exercised only pursuant to a declaration of war, specific statutory authorization from Congress, or a national emergency created by an attack upon the United States (50 USC Sec. 1541).

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
How did the stamp act tea act and intolerable ascts encourage American colonists to consider revolution against British rule
Flauer [41]
The Stamp Act, Tea Act and Intolerable Acts were put into place without the consent of the colonists. This proved that Britain was not treating them as citizens, but merely as servants to their mother country.

The Americans realized that Britain was not going to stop enacting laws in the colonies this way, and they knew that secession was inevitable.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which invention made the cultivation of cotton profitable and lead to large plantation with minnie slave laborers ?
REY [17]
Cotton gin is the machine.
5 0
3 years ago
What is known as the "incumbency effect?"
sveta [45]

Answer:

a) the advantages a candidate who is running for re-election has over the candidate trying to unseat him or her

Explanation:

Incumbency effect can be defined as the advantages a candidate who is running for re-election has over the candidate trying to unseat him or her in a democratic election process.

Basically, it refers to the tendency (phenomenon) for public officials such as senators or house of representative members who are already holding power (office) to get re-elected over an opposition. This ultimately implies that, a candidate contesting with an incumbent candidate is automatically placed at a disadvantage to emerge as the winner election due to the power of incumbency (incumbency effect).

<em>Additionally, the incumbency effect is peculiar to democratic elections and most favorable or stronger for the house of representative members.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
How were the independence movements in Algeria and the Congo similar?
PSYCHO15rus [73]
Hello there.
Happy Valentine's Day⸮❍◡❍?
<span>How were the independence movements in Algeria and the Congo similar?
</span><span>
C they were appeased by the promise of participation in the </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the presidency of John Adams show that there continued to be a battle over the balance of power between the states and t
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me i only have 2 hour's left and that leave's me do to this until 10 so please help me! History kinda sucks
    9·1 answer
  • How did the internal conflicts that the us faced lead to a new government?
    14·1 answer
  • What best shows why many Anti-Federalists finally agreed to the approval of the U.S. Constitution?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the Iroquois Confederacy?
    11·1 answer
  • What is not true about the treaty of brest-litovsk of 1918
    5·2 answers
  • How did President Herbert Hoover propose to resolve economic depression in
    5·1 answer
  • Describing the Work of Helpers-Production Workers
    9·2 answers
  • What would be an example of a time when you would want to use standard English?
    12·1 answer
  • President reagan ordered the cia to recruit guerrilla fighters in which country? iran iraq nicaragua grenada
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!