Answer:
true she scavenges it before katniss
The question is incomplete because it does not provide any options, which are the following:
A. She likes fish, so I think she will like sushi.
B. If you like strawberries, you will like burritos.
C. He likes to read, so I'm sure he will enjoy the library.
D. If you like steak and potatoes, you will like this stew.
Answer:
B. If you like strawberries, you will like burritos.
Explanation:
Non sequitur refers to a stated conclusion that is not necessarily a logical result of the facts presented. In the answer, the fact that all the houses in the area are expensive does not necessarily imply that they are well-built.
Other examples of non sequitur are:
<em>I've lived in this town for a long time and my grandfather was the first mayor, so I'm against putting fluoride in the drinking water!</em>
<em />
<em>Matt likes cooking, which involves food, so he should work at a grocery store.</em>
The answers are: It does not allow listeners to interpret each character through his or her tone; and it does not allow listeners to review or reread what each character has said.
When hearing the characters voices out loud, and in the hypothetical case that it is a live audition and not a recording, one, as part of the audience, does not have, evidently, the possibility of reviewing or rereading what each character says. This may seem vane, but in reality, it can be very important when reading since sometimes the sense of what´s being read is so profound that, in order to capture in full, one needs to review a certain passage.
Also, hearing the characters has the disadvantage of making their voices concrete and specific according to whoever is speaking. This leaves out the possibility of filling the character´s voice with one´s own imagination, wit, and fantasy, which usually are very important characteristics of a fictional character (literature, in the end, is always a very subjective activity on the side of the reader).
This isn't a great story, to be quite honest. The story focuses less on the ways man used to start fires and more on the ways that nature started fires independently of humans.
That being said, it would seem as though the author is trying to express the fragility of fire early on, and it does seem as though he/she is saying that early on, humans just found a small amount of fire from a really dangerous origin to use as a kindling.
For sure, your answer should come from the second paragraph, which is the paragraph describing early kindling methods.
