In the short run, the individual competitive firm's supply curve is that segment of the: "marginal cost curve lying above the average variable cost curve."
<h3>
What is the short run supply curve?</h3>
The short run supply curve of a business is the section of its marginal cost curve that is higher than its average variable cost curve.
According to the law of supply, when the market price rises, the company will supply more of its product.
A perfectly competitive business maximizes profit by generating the amount of production that equals the product's price and marginal cost.
Learn more about Short-Run Supply curve at;
brainly.com/question/15178628
#SPJ1
Answer:
The statement is absolutely wrong.
Explanation:
The reason is that the just like humans, a company is also part of the society and so it owes a duty of care towards them. The least that an organisation can do is to compensate the stakeholders that are harmed by their operations.
In the nutshell, the animals and plants are also part of our society and they have an equal right to live on this planet as we have. The least the company can do is not harm them or if it harms them due to its negligence then it should compensate them.
Answer:
B. Wal-Mart and Texaco.
Explanation:
When labors or workers believe that they treated unfair they can react by leaving the organization or in an extreme case filing a lawsuit. Corporations have to spend millions of dollars for settlement of discrimination lawsuits. An average settlement for such lawsuit can be $45,000 and in greater cases it could reach to $1 million. Wal-Mart and Texaco companies have also faced such lawsuits and spent millions of dollars for the settlement.
Answer with Explanation:
The negligence act would be used here and for a plaintiff to prove to win the suit following four factors must have to be proved which are:
- Duty of care
- Breach
- Cause
- Harm
<u>Part 1. Duty of Care</u>
The railroad company owed a duty of care to every person rail station and the way they had exercised this duty of care was in the form of red light that David Harris saw, which means they exercised reasonable duty of care to avoid the misshapen. This means the duty of care that David Harris owes to himself was not crossing the yellow line.
<u>Part 2. Breach</u>
In fact David Harris was the one to avoid the red light signal and was out of the yellow line. So the breach of duty of care was of David Harris not of the railroad company.
<u>Part 3. Cause</u>
The cause of the breach of duty of care by David Harris was negligence because neither was the railroad signals were allowing him nor he was saving somebody else's life.
<u>Part 4. Harm</u>
Yes, the negligence of David Harris resulted in his death which is the most harm a person can suffer.
<u>Conclusion:</u>
As only harm was satisfactory not the other 3 factors were in the favor of plaintiff, so the widow's argument is incorrect and David Harris was negligent not the railroad company. Hence railroad company owes nothing in compensation to the David Harris's widow.
According to the released information, a Deloitte insights survey found that companies use AI to "<u>enhance workforce and customer experiences."</u>
<h3>Deloitte research survey on AI application</h3>
The Deloitte research was conducted on the current state of AI in the enterprise. The study revealed that companies use AI to "enhance workforce and customer experiences."
Also, the types of companies that are advancing toward this objective include the following:
- Pathseekers: High outcome, low deployed
- Transformers: High outcome, high deployed
- Starters: Low outcome, low deployed
- Underachievers: Low outcome, high deployed
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>enhance workforce and customer experiences."</u>
Learn more about the impact of AI on business here: brainly.com/question/25757825