1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
3 years ago
13

In western europe and north america, scientists began to understand the causes of infectious diseases at about what point in his

tory?
History
2 answers:
zvonat [6]3 years ago
5 0
In western europe and north america, scientists began to understand the causes of infectious diseases at about what point in history?1850

Archy [21]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is a) 1850.

In Western Europe and North America, scientists began to understand the causes of infectious diseases at about 1850.

Scientist in Europe or The United States could better understand the nature of some diseases with the help of better technology and instruments. They started to understand that infectious diseases were disorders caused by organisms. These microorganisms were viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi. They understood that these diseases were contagious and could be transmitted by humans, animals, and insects. They also understood the human body reaction to these diseases and the medicine to cure them. For instance, in the mid-1850s, they discovered that Vibrio Cholera was transmitted by contaminated water. The bacteria embeds in the intestinal tract.

The other options of the question were B) 1650, C) 1950, and D) 1750.

You might be interested in
Discuss the benefits and problems of capitalism and s
Zigmanuir [339]

Capitalism is an economic system in which investments in an ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private  individuals or corporations specially as contrasted to cooperatively state-owned means of wealth. Socialism is a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.

<h2>Why do people say that capitalism works better than socialism?</h2>

Capitalism and socialism have both been put to the test. Socialism never works; capitalism occasionally does. The outcomes are self-evident.

  • China. After the cultural revolution, the communist party seized power in China. They didn't have much financial success with anything. In its place, starvation claimed the lives of millions. Capitalist policies were put into place when Moa Zedong left office, and economic development suddenly skyrocketed.
  • US versus USSR The huge ideological conflict between capitalism and socialism was eventually the cause of the cold war. The sides began on land that was largely level. There is no doubt who won. The USA is currently the world's most powerful country by a wide margin. There is no longer a Soviet Union.
  • Almost all affluent countries, including the UK, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, and even the Nordic countries, have capitalist systems. All have different amounts of social expenditure, but this is only sustained by the underlying capitalism.
  • Cuba. Cubans are all equal, yet they are all equally impoverished. Nearly everyone in Cuba has it better than even those who are regarded as impoverished in prosperous countries like the USA.
  • Venezuela. elected a communist administration. They are currently in financial ruin. It would be difficult to locate a socialist administration that has made any effort to better the lives of its citizens. Although I would think there are none at all, perhaps I haven't looked closely enough.

In conclusion, a basic misunderstanding of human nature is the basis of socialism. When everyone actually ends up doing is trying to piggyback off of everyone else's hard work, it makes the false assumption that everyone is willing to labor selflessly for the benefit of the group. Although it is not a flawless system, capitalism at least provides a reward for effort. And when it comes down to it, hard effort is what improves our lives.

<h2>What are the pros and cons of socialism and capitalism?</h2>

Capitalism:

Pros ⇒ It is a method of voluntary trade. It is the best at allocating scarce resources. It has given people the highest quality of life in human history. Property rights, arbitrary assessments, and free will are all protected. It best manages self-interest. It rewards people who make the world a better place by making them rich. Static economic classes are eliminated by capitalism's dynamic character. Of course, there is more.

Cons ⇒ There isn't a spokesperson for free market capitalism. Market manipulation, monopolies, oligopolies, cronyism, fascism, inflation, central banking, fractional reserve banking, and any other financial news-related scheme are all confused with it.

Socialism:

Pro ⇒ Fair distribution of total generated wealth

Cons ⇒ It is oppressive. The loss of private property in the means of production prevents accurate economic calculations. Rare resources are squandered since there aren't genuine prices (actual prices reflect consumer values) (mountains of Soviet concrete). It does not satisfy the insatiable human drive for more (demand). denies possessing oneself. It establishes two static classes, one for workers and the other for politicians. Marx demanded that "undesirables" be removed from society (Irish, Scottish and non-whites).  

8 0
1 year ago
What are three supporting details about why U.S. Intervention in the boxer rebellion was a problem?
lana66690 [7]

The U.S intervention in the boxer rebellion was a problem for three main reasons:

  1. Americans in China were taking advantage of China's culture and resources.
  2. The Chinese people lost independence since Americans wanted to show other nations that they were superior to China by introducing them to other traditions, religion and products that changed their own.
  3. During the rebellion, there was a great number of Americans in the country.  
5 0
3 years ago
Who was the totalitarian leader in Spain that looked to Hitler and Mussolini for help gaining power?
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer: Francisco Franco

Explanation:

Francisco Franco was governing over Spain during WWII, and worked with Hitler (dictator of Germany) and Mussolini (dictator of Italy) in order to gain power and fight the war.

3 0
2 years ago
Who was francis marison?
tiny-mole [99]

Answer:

Francis Morrison was an American soldier who fought in the American Civil War. Morrison received his country's highest award for bravery during combat, the Medal of Honor. Morrison's medal was won for his actions in the Bermuda Hundred Campaign on June 17, 1864.

Hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
What were some short term effects of the courts decision in the slaughterhouse cases?
timama [110]
<span>The effects of the Judge's ruling on the slaughter house cases rendered the 14th amendment useless. Blacks were not deprived of equal rights, but they were deprived of equal wages. State legislatures were able to once again suspend the rights of black citizens.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the best description of the conservatives
    13·1 answer
  • 3. What is a myth? any long poem that tells a story a traditional tale about gods and heroes a false story that was written by t
    15·2 answers
  • How did life change for middle class women in the 1890s?
    13·1 answer
  • the early civilizations of the Nile River Valley, Mesopotamia, and the Huang He were similar because they were​
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP MEEE!
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Cherokee and Creek civilians take refuge in the Red River Valley after the Battle of Honey Springs? What was their fligh
    15·1 answer
  • Match the following items.
    5·1 answer
  • Why were pharaohs and priests the most powerful and wealthy people in ancient egypt?
    5·2 answers
  • Which was NOT a direct cause of the great depression ?
    12·1 answer
  • What were the most common favors political bosses distributed to loyal party members during the era of political machines?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!