1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yuradex [85]
3 years ago
15

Ramirez's adjusted basis in a passive activity is $45,000 at the beginning of the year. His loss from the activity for the curre

nt year is $14,200. Ramirez has wages of $65,000 and dividend income of $300. At year-end, Ramirez has the following:
1. Adjusted basis in the passive activity: $______
2. At-risk amount in the passive activity: $________
3. A suspended passive loss: $_______
Business
1 answer:
sattari [20]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1. $30,800

2. $30,800

3. $14,200

Explanation:

1. Calculation to determine the Adjusted basis in the passive activity

Using this formula

Adjusted basis in the passive activity=Beginning adjusted basis in a passive activity-Loss activity for the current year

Adjusted basis in the passive activity=$45,000-$14,200

Adjusted basis in the passive activity=$30,800

Therefore Adjusted basis in the passive activity is $30,800

2. Calculation to determine At-risk amount in the passive activity

Using this formula

At-risk amount=Beginning adjusted basis in a passive activity-Loss activity for the current year

Let plug in the formula

At-risk amount=$45,000-$14,200

At-risk amount=$30,800

Therefore At-risk amount in the passive activity is $30,800

3. Based on the information given we were told that His loss amount from the activity for the current year was the amount of $14,200 which means that the suspended PASSIVE LOSS will be $14,200.

You might be interested in
A manufacturing company currently produces 1,000 units of a product at a cost of $5,000. The units sell for $7,000. Alternativel
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

The company should not further process the product as it results in income reduction by $1000.

Explanation:

According to the given data, company current profit for 1000 units is :

= (cost of sell) - (cost of manufacturing)

= $7000 - $5000

= $2000 (current profit)

While when company further process the product, the profit will be :

= (cost of sell) - (cost of manufacture)

= $10000 - ( $5000 + $4000)

= $10000 - $9000

= $1000

It clearly shows that further processing the product may result in reduction of profit by $1000.

Hence the company should not further process the product.

4 0
4 years ago
HELP ASAP PLZZZZ ECON
Aleks [24]

Answer: A.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an explanation of the capture theory​? A. When products have too many warning labels comma consumers m
seropon [69]

Answer: B. People who have been in an industry are most likely to be asked to be regulators of the industry.

Explanation:

The Capture Theory or Regulatory Capture refers to a situation where the agencies that are supposed to be regulating an industry come under the influence of the companies they are meant to be regulating.

This leads to a situation where the Agencies make regulations that favour these companies instead of the consumer.

One key way this occurs is the REVOLVING DOOR. This is known as the tendency of professionals to move between Government and Private jobs. Simply put, a professional could work in an industry and then go on to work in an Agency regulating that industry. Once this happens, the once private citizens could start influencing the Agencies in favour of their previous bosses.

7 0
3 years ago
Use the minimax method to find all of the pure-startegy Nash equilibria for the following zero-sum games. Then, check your answe
Anit [1.1K]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

i dont really know,can someone explain to mee

6 0
3 years ago
Explain how aggregate demand changes when the government increases taxes by​ $100 billion. Aggregate demand​ ______.
Mrac [35]

Answer: D. decreases by less than $100 billion because the tax multiplier is negative

Explanation:

If the Government were to increase taxes then it would reduce the amount of money for spending (disposable income) that people have to be able to buy goods and services.

As a result they will buy less goods and services but this would be less than the $100 billion tax imposed on them because the effect of the tax multiplier is negative.

Tax Multiplier = -Marginal Propensity to Consume / (1 - MPC)

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Dawn's stepson tony tells her that he is going to lock her in a closet for a week unless she gives him a check for $20,000. dawn
    14·1 answer
  • A net loss on the income statement reduces what account in the stockholders' equity section of the balance sheet
    7·2 answers
  • In macroeconomics, a _______________ describes the common way in which market values are measured in an economy (Money acts as a
    9·1 answer
  • Gross income minus any adjustments, deductions, and exemptions is known as
    15·2 answers
  • The current stock price of Alcoco is $70, and the stock does not pay dividends. The instantaneous risk-free rate of return is 6%
    9·1 answer
  • In the context of fixed-quantity systems,__________is defined as the on-hand quantity (oh) plus any orders placed but which have
    9·1 answer
  • Utica Corporation paid $360,000 to purchase land and a building. An appraisal showed that the land is worth $100,000 and the bui
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose the government decides to issue a new savings bond that is guaranteed to double in value if you hold it for 20 years. As
    14·1 answer
  • Management at Work
    10·1 answer
  • Which person is living within their means?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!