One narrative technique for consolidating the gains a client makes involves a therapist writing letters to the person. this is documenting the evidence.Basically, the externalization of a problem consists in the linguistic separation of the problem of the personal identity of the client.In recent years, therapists around the world have begun to evaluate the narrative approach, reducing the weight of the traditional client-therapist relationship and treating the concept of personal identity as a fluid social construction. The appeal of this Narrative Therapy goes beyond the technique, since it represents a fundamental change of direction in the therapeutic world that has been called the Third Wave.
Answer:
Assets
Explanation:
According to my research on different organizational resources for success, I can say that based on the information provided within the question these resources are known as Assets. This is defined as any tangible or intangible resource that is owned by a business or organization and provides them with positive economic value for as long as they hold the resource.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Their sharp-stepped gabled roofs became a permanent part of the landscape, and their merchants gave the city its characteristic commercial atmosphere. The habits bequeathed by the Dutch also gave New York hospitality to the pleasures of everyday life quite different from the austere atmosphere of Puritan Boston.
Explanation:
pls mark brainliest
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
