This is an example of <u>"hegemonic masculinity".</u>
In gender studies, hegemonic masculinity is a piece of R. W. Connell's gender order theory, which perceives numerous masculinities that differ crosswise over time, culture and the person. Hegemonic masculinity is characterized as a training that legitimizes men's prevailing position in the public arena and legitimizes the subordination of ladies, and other minimized methods for being a man. Conceptually, hegemonic masculinity proposes to clarify how and why men keep up overwhelming social jobs over ladies, and other sex personalities, which are seen as "feminine" in a given society.
Goods that are considered to be needs tend to be inelastic when the price changes.
Answer:
Explanation:
Democratic leaders emphasize collaboration and the free-flow of ideas.
While these leaders do allow shared participation in decision-making, they often decide who is a part of the group or committee tasked with making decisions.
Responsibility is shared among all members of staff with the leader present to offer guidance and keep discussions balanced and controlled.
Participative leadership instill mutual respect among those involved that create candid and open conversations.
Democratic leaders can often be seen in positions in nonprofit organizations, school boards, and forward-thinking companies.
The arches of the foot is held in position as it is passively aided and actively held back by flexible tendons that tends to add to the weight bearing ability of the foot.
<h3>What holds the arches of the foot in position?</h3>
The curvature of the arch is known to be held in place by the fibularis longus tendon, and it is often aided by the tibialis posterior tendon, that is seen both cross under the back or sole of the foot.
Therefore, The arches of the foot is held in position as it is passively aided and actively held back by flexible tendons that tends to add to the weight bearing ability of the foot.
Learn more about arches from
brainly.com/question/4298127
#SPJ12
Answer:
A group has the potential to collect more complete information, compared to an individual, while making decisions. An individual uses his own intuition and views. A group has many members, so its many views and many approaches result in better decision-making.
Explanation:
Hope this will help
