Answer:
Explanation:
It was part of a grand plan designed to control the seceding states. It called for the blockade of southern ports and in taking control of the Mississippi River to cut the South in two. It was not unlike the actions of an Anaconda snake in slowly constricting and suffocating its victim hence the name.
The correct answer for this question is "D. india."
<span>
Janel is a traveler from 1350 BCE and is an adherent of hinduism a polytheistic religion. The place that is most likely Janel's home is in </span>D. india. India is known to be hinduism and has a lot of gods.
The significant intermarriage of the conquistadores with the Indian women meant that this was the beginning of the development of mestizos or mixed people of both Spanish and Indian origin and these people make up a large proportion of the population of Latin America, from 26-90% of the populations of the Latin American countries with the maximum mestizo population being at least in Honduras at 90%.
Answer:
I agree.
Explanation:
Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was a scholar of great wisdom. He recognized the shortcomings of both English society and Muslim society in India, moreover, he knew how these shortcomings created disagreements and gaps between the two populations and that this was very damaging to his people.
The 1857 revolt made these gaps even bigger. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan sided with the British, but he did not fail to point out that the revolt and all the violence resulting from it was the fault of the British, in ignoring the needs and factors that make up Indian culture, in addition to establishing colonialism in a very aggressive, which caused the Indian elites to revolt and seek to free themselves from this type of government. Based on that, he advised he advised the British on ways to please the Indian population, allowing that population to have a voice and to help with the administration of the country. This was one of the greatest achievements of his life, because it brought these two populations together, for a certain period of time.
The Dred Scott vs. Sandford case was monumental in America, as it stated that slaves had no rights which their owners were bound to respect. Along with this, it also stated that slaves are property and can be brought into free states.
This case causes significant divide between the nation. The southern states and those individuals with slaves see this as a victory, as they can now take their slaves wherever they want without the fear of these individuals becoming free men. On the other hand, abolitionists and states who outlawed slavery are furious. This is because they now have to allow slave owners to keep their slaves in a state where they do not want slavery. This case resulted in a bigger divide between those for slavery and those against slavery.
