Answer:
Editing for content
Explanation:
Vincent is reading over the paper that he has written. He realizes that he went off on a bit of a tangent, and one of his main points does not line up with his thesis statement. This was discovered while Vincent was <u>editing for content</u>.
Editing for content is also known as heavy editing, this type of editing involves checking to see if the content of the write-up is okay and in-line with the topic of interest and any unnecessary content is removed.
Answer:
Consumers and producers in a free market economy are "free" to produce and consume what ever they want, and demand for products dictates production--whereas in a command economy, producers are told how much to produce by the government.
Explanation:
In a free market economy is where the individuals who are the producers, make their own decisions on what products to produce and sell.In this type of market, the government does not intervene. The advantage of this system is that producers have full control to produce products of their choice and they are more multivated to work and produce goods to earn money.This also boosts the economy growth by allowing the total control to the producers who produce goods according to the demand of the market.
Answer: Topic Sentence??
Explanation: Without context, I cannot know what they want you to say.
Answer:
Explanation:
<u>One of the examples of behavior that would be considered deviant in one society and not in the other is the eating of certain animals. The examples are:</u>
- Some societies in India consider the cow a sacred animal and never would consume beef.
- Muslim societies do not eat pork meat.
- Insects are considered a tasty snack in many countries, including Thailand, while it would be considered gross by many people from the west.
- While some of the western European countries (like France and Belgium) have specialized butcher shops and restaurants for horse meat, eating it would most likely be considered taboo in the US or UK.
- The most radical example is the eating of dogs, which occurs in some Asian countries, most notably China. There is even a whole festival for dog meat consumption in Yulin, and every year there are protests across the globe because of this event. Slaughtering dogs for meat consumption is prohibited in the US and plenty of other countries.
<u>With all of this, we can conclude that some food consumption can be seen as deviant in some parts of the world, while in others it is a normal occurrence and part of the every-day diet.</u>
Despite various taboos and laws, what we have to understand is that our connection to the animals is culturally constructed. The fact that people of the US feel closer to dogs, cats, and horses, but not to sheep and pigs, is not the fact supported by nature. There is nothing in nature itself and the nutrition of horses, insects, and various other species that prevents us to eat them. These deviances surrounding different meats are all culturally constructed. <u>This does not mean they are less real or that we should eat all the animals, just that we have to realize that our ways are no naturally more or less right than someone else’s.</u>
