Answer:
c) $25,000
Explanation:
A property dividend should be recorded in retained earnings at the property's <u>market value at date of declaration.</u>
<u>The date of declaration is the date on which the firm has made the commitment to pay the dividend. The market value on this date is the value that was considered when the board made the decision to distribute a property dividend and thus is the appropriate measure of the sacrifice to the firm.
</u>
<u>
</u>In application to the scenario, <u>the property dividend will be recorded in retained earnings at the market value at the date of declaration which is Jan 15 </u>NOT on the day it is payable.
Hence, retained earnings will reduce by $25,000
In 20X5, Elm Corp. bought 10,000 shares of Oil Corp. at a cost of $20,000. On January 15, 20X6, Elm declared a property dividend of the Oil stock to shareholders of record on February 1, 20X6, payable on February 15, 20X6. During 20X6, the Oil stock had the following market values:
January 15
$25,000
February 1
26,000
February 15
24,000
Answer:
What is the question?
Explanation:
I suppose that is if it is profitable to hire the new worker, according to microeconomics this decision must be based in something called marginal income and must be compare with the marginal cost because they can increase the income but not the profit depending of the cost of the new worker.
<span>Net domestic product (NDP) equals the output of the economy (GDP) minus the depreciation of the nation's capital goods. This is an indicator of how much a nation must "invest" to continue that current GDP.
To solve for the NDP your equation would be:
NDP = GDP - depreciation
When you are finding the NDP of something, you are commonly referring to a house, vehicle or the life span of a machine. </span>
Answer: incidental beneficiary
Explanation:
An incidental beneficiary refers to an individual who isn't a party to a contract but later becomes a third party beneficiary who is unintended to the contract.
It should be noted that the incidental beneficiary has no rights that are enforceable under the contract. With regards to the question, Jim suffered losses as a result, but he had no rights in the contract because he was an incidental beneficiary.
