Many World War I soldiers were drafted. How did this fact influence the way the U.S. government handled the war?

History

1 answer:

Charra [1.4K]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

People believed that their country needed their help to succeed in the war in Europe. Many World War I soldiers were drafted. How did this fact influence the way the U.S. government handled the war? ... They used CPI propaganda and court-martialed men who avoided registering for the draft.

You might be interested in

In the south Pacific region shown on this map, which factor MOST led to the use of over 1,000 languages there up through start o

ruslelena [56]

Answer: B) lack of effective and speedy transportation

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Based on this document, what can

miss Akunina [59]

From the tone of this speaker, I can infer that the life in the colonies was of mixed feelings.

From what the speaker said, it seems like the colonists are divided on the quest for independence. According to him, the British people had done some good. The only issue he had was based on taxation.

He agrees that the British had changed the colonies by making it to flourish and have more population. He likened this growth to be the effort of the British.

He wanted the people to be grateful to the British for the protection that they received under them.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What accounts for the success of absolutism in some parts of Europe and its failure

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. And this reality could be social, political or religious.

Explanation:

I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.

France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. The question is: why this conception worked in France? Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.
On the contrary, in England, the king was subjected to the Parlament. However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). This idea attests that a king has duties with its people, and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.