1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fed [463]
2 years ago
11

PLEASE HELP

History
2 answers:
aleksandr82 [10.1K]2 years ago
7 0
I believe the early United States wasn’t a land of opportunity nor equality. Although we are transitioning to becoming one we aren’t fully there yet . When i think of the Early United States I think of the Royal colony/ Trustee era . I think of british colonization . After we were finally able to gain our independence, we engaged in immoral acts due to our ethnocentric modes of thinking. We adapted slaves in the south and treated them horribly . We caused generational trauma, African American disenfranchisement, and much more . Also when the constitution was made the first amendment right was Free speech . Our second amendment right was the right to bear arms . I happen to notice how the first five amendments barely have anything to do with human rights. The term the “land of opportunity” and “equality” only applied to white men . During those days even white women barely had rights . America was an anti-semitic, racist country in that time period . Many people weren’t treated fairly including the Native Americans who were on the land before it was “discovered”. America was not fair for all. It was a land of opportunity for white men. In 1892 when the pledge of allegiance was written it stated “With liberty and justice for all” which was never and is currently not the case .
atroni [7]2 years ago
5 0
I would argue that one cannot judge the fairness of any particular distribution without knowing something about the rules of the game that gave rise to it. Imagine a society in which incomes were as
You might be interested in
Which is the best description of civil liberties?
MakcuM [25]
"<span>rights guaranteed by law" would be the best option from the list, since these liberties can be taken away from people through the course of due process in a legal setting.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Match each goal of the Enlightenment with its description.
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

social contract: an agreement between citizens and  their government.

separation of powers : the division of power among judicial,  legislative, and executive branches.

equality: the belief that all people should be  treated the same.

natural rights: rights people are born with.

Explanation:

The Enlightenment period refers to a philosophical and architectural development that influenced the different fields of ideas in Europe from 1600 to 1800. The main objectives of the Enlightenment thinkers were freedom, progress, rationality, liberty, and religious tolerance. e In France, the core principles of enlightenment philosophy were natural rights, the ideas of equality, liberty, and how the people should the governed in a state, in contrast to the theory of absolute monarchy and the existing dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church.

6 0
3 years ago
What kind of force supports objects that are not moving?
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

I think the answer is "Normal Force"

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What has been a lasting impact of European colonialism?
ki77a [65]
A lasting impact of European colonialism was the creation of  artificial boundaries created by colonial rulers brought together and separated people arbitrarily. For example, if you look at the boundaries of the nations in Africa, you will notice that cultural groups were divided and combined within and by lines created by European powers.

7 0
3 years ago
Could someone please help me with these questions about Manifest Destiny I beg
notsponge [240]
Okay: 1: Manifest Destiny was the belief by many Americans that it was God’s Will that they spread the continent and teach their culture,religion, etc.
2: The impact of Manifest Destiny led to the US trying to expand west, this would lead to the Mexican-American War and Mexican Cession.
3: it was more of a good thing for the US, if they expanded west, they have both borders, they have more resources, and they would have more land for slavery to spread.
4: I guess that’s your opinion
5: 2 pros: Allows the US to secure their borders, Allows the US to gain more territory and gain the resources, Cons: It led to many Native Americans being killed and their land being took, it further led to sectionalism in the US. It’s impacts would eventually lead to a war between Mexico and the US, it also further divides the US because Polk, wanted the land for slavery to spread however many US people did not want that to happen.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • (For US history) Why were tobacco, rice, and indigo plantations more common in areas east of the fall line?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes the origins
    9·2 answers
  • In which rebellion in india in the mid-1800s did natives challenge British <br> power
    11·1 answer
  • American government collapsed in 1774-75 because a. Americans stopped paying their taxes so that by 1776, 90 percent were in a t
    6·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of federalism
    14·2 answers
  • during the 1920s the republican presidents acted A.to support big bussiness B.to end child labor C.to break up trusts D.to incre
    15·1 answer
  • Longbow vs. Crossbow in the Hundred Years’ War
    11·1 answer
  • Which statements about the reign of louis 14 are true
    13·1 answer
  • What is one reason why some Americans wanted the United States to help Cuban revolutionaries fight against Spain in the late 189
    12·1 answer
  • The Red Scare of the early 1900s led to significant distrust in
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!