1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GuDViN [60]
3 years ago
7

Where is the Persian Gulf?

History
1 answer:
Leona [35]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

north

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement about visions is correct? People seldom have dying visions that are not closely related to their own religious t
uysha [10]
I believe it is this; dying visions typically follow a very similar three-step pattern.
3 0
3 years ago
What was the new racial order proposed by nazis
yan [13]
The new racial is Aryan race that was in a nationalities. Hope this helps
5 0
2 years ago
In the mid-1800s, different regions had different needs and interests. Match each region to the correct description.
Hitman42 [59]

Answer: The South: had an economy that was based on cash

crops grown on plantations

The West: had a desire for affordable land and

improved transportation

The North: had a focus on industry, including

manufacturing and trade

Explanation:

I just Know

5 0
2 years ago
Which tribe signed away most of its lands in illinois after being harassed by anglo settlers in 1819?
noname [10]
<span>Kickapoo tribe signed most of its land after being harassed by anglo settlers in 1819.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Irish politician charles stewart parnell demanded british support for which controversial policy in return for irish votes in pa
    8·1 answer
  • How did the Dutch extract raw materials from their colonies in the East Indies?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the name of the tax paid to the church
    7·2 answers
  • Put the events from World War II in the correct order
    12·1 answer
  • The Spanish Civil War between fascism and elected leaders was won by the
    10·2 answers
  • After the end of the year, you can expect to receive a form from your employer stating how much you earned and how much you paid
    10·2 answers
  • One of the first true historians was____whose famous book, The Persian Wars, talks about Persia quite a bit.
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Third Estate change the Estates General?
    12·2 answers
  • How did Pericles expand the Athenian navy? He raised taxes on overseas trade. He took apart the army to pay for ships. He used t
    10·2 answers
  • Israel gained territory from egypt and syria in 1967 during the six day war. What was a major outcome of this action?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!