Men's earnings are largely viewed as supplemental to women's. D would be the correct option.
<h3>What is gender pay gap?</h3>
It is the deliberate reduction in the pay of women as opposed to men in the same job position.
The gender pay gap is justified by a couple of arguments. These include:
- Women being employed in lower-paying jobs as opposed to men.
- Women sacrificing career growth in favor of raising children.
- Women asking for lesser payment during the selection phase
Thus, the earnings of men being viewed as supplemental to women's is not one of the arguments used in justifying the gender pay gap.
More on gender pay gap can be found here: brainly.com/question/14511610
#SPJ1
a) women are disproportionately employed in lower-paying, lower-status occupations
b) Women leave the labor market to care for children and elderly parents and then re-enter it
c) women underestimate their worth to employers and ask for less than their male counterparts
d) Men's earnings are largely viewed as supplemental to women's
Answer:
a large dance star
Explanation:
because it is bigger and heavier
If the pressure, volume, and temperature are 202650 Pa, 0.004 cubic meters, and 400.15 K. Then the number of the mole is 0.24 mol.
<h3>What is thermodynamics?</h3>
It is a branch of science that deals with heat and work transfer.
We know that the Ideal gas equation is given as
PV = nRT
Where
P = Pressure (Pa)
V = Volume (in m³)
n = Number of moles (mol)
R = universal gas constant (8.314 J⋅K⁻¹⋅mol⁻¹)
T = temperature (in K)
We have
P = 2 atm = 202.65 × 10³ Pa
V = 4 liters = 0.004 m³
T = 127 °C = 400.15 K
Then we have
Then the number of the mole will be
More about the thermodynamics link is given below.
brainly.com/question/7206767
#SPJ1
Answer:
B- is likely going to be your answer.
Hamilton thinks judges should be appointed permanently rather than on a periodic basis because periodic appointments would destroy a judge’s independence.
Alexander Hamilton was an American revolutionary. He was also a statesman and the Founding Father of the United States. He played a key role in promotion and interpretation of the constitution.
Permanent appointments would help to regulate more as well ensure greater independence of the judge.
Periodic appointment on the other hand would destroy a judge independence as he/she can be transferred or impeached anytime that fosters insecurity and lack of motivation to work.
Thus, permanent appointments is the only option.
To learn more about judges here
brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ4
