1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phoenix [80]
2 years ago
8

Your social studies class is studying different forms of U.S. currency over time. Write an essay in which you take a position on

whether or not the penny should be preserved. Use the information from the passages in your essay. Manage your time carefully so that you can read the passages, plan your response, write your response; and revise and edit your response. . . Be sure to include a claim address opposing claims; use evidence from multiple sources, and avoid overly relying on one source. . Your response should be in the form of a multi-paragraph essay. Type your response in the space provided​
English
1 answer:
vitfil [10]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: below is the essay

Explanation:

The penny has been in circulation as a type of U.S. currency for over a hundred years. Still, the costs and benefits of the penny have been contested for decades. In fact, the time has come to discontinue this piece of history. The penny is a burden to produce, carry, and count, and concerns about its elimination are unfounded. Without a doubt, the penny is a useless piece of currency and should not be preserved.

Simply put, producing the penny causes the government to lose money. In his letter to the editor, David Carroll explains that “a penny currently costs the United States government 2.4 cents to mint” (Carroll). Obviously, the penny costs more than twice as much to manufacture as it is actually worth. It is absurd to continue minting a coin that results in so much loss! In fact, according to “Penny Anti” by John Fund, the U.S. Treasury loses $100 million a year by continuing to produce the penny. Despite this great cost, the Treasury must continue to produce more and more pennies each year to keep them in circulation. The government loses money on every penny it produces, when it could be spending this taxpayer funding on building and maintaining schools, roads, or national parks. Clearly, our resources should be used wisely and carefully, not squandered on useless, costly coins.

In addition to being a waste of taxpayer money, using the penny for transactions is also a waste of consumers’ time. Every day, people go through the hassle of reaching into their pockets or digging into their purses, hoping to pull out the correct change for a purchase. Jeff Gore, a scientist from MIT, calculated that employees and consumers waste an average of “2.4 hours per year” counting out pennies for transactions (Fund). This means that employees stand idly while customers shuffle through coins to pay for something, and then they juggle coins as they recount the total and sort out change. This time builds up, costing their employers money in wages and frustrating people waiting in line for their turn. According to Carroll, getting rid of the penny would make it “considerably easier to count change.” Instead of having to sort through four different coins to find the correct amount of change, it would simplify the process. People just want the hassle of hunting for change to end. Getting rid of the penny in consumer transactions would save shoppers and businesses time and money.

Some people may worry that eliminating the penny would lead to confusion (Fund), but eliminating a unit of currency has been done before without causing problems. In 1857, for example, the half-cent was abolished across the United States but “people afterward had no problem living and conducting business” (Fund). Even though the economy at the time relied heavily on coins as currency, no banks or businesses collapsed, and there were no major customer protests. All the confusion that people anticipated was minor. Some people suggested that businesses might round up against the consumer if the penny were eliminated, but that did not happen (Fund and Carroll). Again, just thirty years ago, the Department of Defense eliminated the penny on overseas military bases, and no serious problems occurred as a result (Carroll). At present, the economy relies even more on debit and credit cards than it did in the past, so eliminating a form of currency would be even easier. Clearly, the transition to a world without the penny would be easy.

From all angles, the penny should be eliminated as a form of U.S. currency. Americans’ tax dollar should not be spent in manufacturing this coin each year, especially when consumers do not value it enough to pick it up off the ground. Beyond that, shoppers and shop owners alike all waste time counting pennies each year, and time adds up to more money wasted on this useless coin. With all the available evidence considered, the United States should definitely eliminate this useless coin.

You might be interested in
What are some words of connotations of chateau
Musya8 [376]

wealth

grandeur

luxury

<em>If one of your choices is secrecy, DO NOT choose it. Secrecy is not related to the word chateau.</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Why orchestras are seeing dwindling audiences?
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

For many orchestras, the traditional subscriber base is declining. It is important for orchestras to understand why people become subscribers so that this market segment can be replaced. This exploratory research was designed to ascertain the age of first concert attendance and motivation for first concert attendance for two audience groups of the Philharmonia Orchestra in London. The two groups were (1) subscribers, and (2) audience members who did not subscribe and had no other involvement with the orchestra. The responses to questions on age and motivation were compared in an attempt to understand why some individuals became subscribers while others attended concerts but did not become further involved with the orchestra. The hypothesis was that subscribers started to attend while young and that early exposure resulted in continued and frequent attendance throughout life.

Explanation:

copy pasted from a website from 2001 its the best i got im sorry bro good luck

4 0
3 years ago
100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!!
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

A good summary of an essay should probably include the main idea of each paragraph, and the main evidence supporting that idea, unless it is not relevant to the article or essay as a whole. A summary does not need a conclusion, but if the original ends with a message to the reader this should not be left out.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Activity 3: BE A PART
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

this is not explanatory

3 0
3 years ago
Help me pleaseee (not answer only for points) I need this​
9966 [12]

Answer:

1.no

2.who

3.the

4.much

5.of

6.dangerous

7.out

8.by

9.lot

10.to

11.where

12.it

Explanation:

I enjoyed answering the questions . I loved the movie when I first saw it. Hope it helps though I'm late.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • REELECTION
    7·1 answer
  • What does it mean to rebut something? to strike with enough force to break an object   to oppose using evidence or an argument  
    6·2 answers
  • What is the importance of Tower Bridge
    10·1 answer
  • In paragraph 3 which rhetorical technique is being used to add emphasis
    6·2 answers
  • In your own words the difference between epidemic(one sentence) and pandemic (2 sentences)​
    8·1 answer
  • 1. The fog comes
    7·1 answer
  • I updated the poem..
    12·2 answers
  • The past still haunts them.​
    6·2 answers
  • How does the video show multiple perspectives?
    14·1 answer
  • B. Students are drawing some pictures now.(into passive voice)​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!