When Spaniards like Columbus, Cortes, and Pizzaro arrived in the "New World," at first their relations with native peoples were rather friendly. There were efforts to associate and negotiate with them. But the Spanish conquistadors ("conquerors") were always in a mindset of superiority and domination over the natives they encountered. If they sought the natives' trust, it was mainly so they could establish a relationship in which they, the Spanish, gained the upper hand. They looked upon the natives as a lesser sort of people and upon themselves as the bringers of proper civilization.
As Spanish efforts continued, they became more aggressive in their desire to gain wealth (gold or whatever other products they could exchange for such wealth). They enslaved natives and went to war with native tribes and nations.
Ultimately, the biggest way that the Europeans brought harm to the native populations, though, was in a way they didn't intend or understand. They brought with them germs and viruses from their continent that hadn't been known on the American continents, and so many natives became gravely ill and died. I've seen some estimates that say that smallpox killed up to 75% of the people in the Inca empire (in Peru) before the epidemics of that disease ran their course.
Answer:
Gold and Diamonds.
Explanation:
The western and northern parts of South Africa are known for being extremely rich in gold and diamonds, those areas are also where the boers lived.
The correct answer is that "Many c<span>omposers rejected tonality and adopted new harmonic structures".
Musical innovations today represents creative structures wherein singers are able to sing based on their own and original harmonic structures, wherein they can sing and create songs based on new harmonic structure, unlike before wherein tonality is needed and is a must.</span>
<span>The political environment of North and south America were affected by the rise of personalist leaders, the revival of Native American resistance and immigration that time. The nations like U.S., Brazil and Argentina experienced hardships in managing themselves under new constitutions. </span>
Hello. Due to the context of your question, I believe there was a typo and the correct word would be "states" instead of "stat." If that is the case, I hope the answer below can help you.
Answer:
A good example of conflict over states' rights would be a case of Nullification Crisis.
Explanation:
Nullification is the term that refers to the ability of states to reject federal laws that they believe to be unfair, incorrect, or offensive in relation to state laws. A case of nullification can cause a political and governmental crisis in the country, causing many problems and harm. An example of this occurred in 1832, when South Carolina regulated some policies established by the federal government and claimed its privilege to invalidate federal decisions.
