Which of the following reasons would force the United States to become more involved in the issues of other countries

History

1 answer:

shepuryov [24]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is C. The rising aggression of Hitler.

Explanation:

During the first 2 years of World War II, America was neutral in the conflict. Thus, it did not participate in any military operation, nor did it get involved in important geopolitical issues, limiting itself to trading with the allied nations, mainly Great Britain.

However, the rise of Hitler as a totalitarian figure in Europe, and his actions against Jews, gypsies and other minorities were not ignored by the Americans, who considered Hitler as a dictatorial figure, dangerous and contrary to democratic values of the nation.

Thus, the further the conflict progressed, the more America aligned itself ideologically with the allies, without participating militarily but supporting them through the provision of inputs. Finally, after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, America declared war on the Axis.

You might be interested in

The process in india whereby an entire caste can leapfrog over another and obtain a higher position in the hierarchy is called:

Katena32 [7]

The process in india whereby an entire caste can leapfrog over another and obtain a higher position in the hierarchy is called sanskritization. Sanskritisation (Indian English) or Sanskritization (American English, Oxford spelling) is a particular form of social change found in India. It denotes the process by which castes placed lower in the caste hierarchy seek upward mobility by emulating the rituals and practices of the upper or dominant castes.

4 0

3 years ago

How were high tariffs supposed to help farmers?

Anna [14]

Tariffs would prevent competition from farmers far way

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why is balancing federal and state powers an ongoing problem?

lora16 [44]

The correct answer is People have different opinions on who should have power to control issues.

Even though the constitution is flexible, there are some issues that arise in our current society that are debated over by state and federal governments. Those in favor of stronger state governments argue that the state representatives have a better idea of what their citizens need. On the other hand, people in favor of have a stronger federal government argue that their needs to be consistency and continuity among the states in the US. These two sides constantly battle over political power.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

3. Look at the confirmation votes for the nominees

Degger [83]

a. The pattern of the confirmation votes for the nominees shows that most nominees favor the president's political inclinations and thoughts, while those whose nominations were not confirmed happened when the Senate majority did not come from the president's party.

There are no noticeable exceptions to the pattern of the confirmation votes, which tend to indicate that the party in the majority in the Senate usually confirms the nominees more than the party in the minority.

b. The confirmation votes have always followed a predictable pattern. When the president's political party aligns with the Senate majority party, most nominees are confirmed, sometimes without much debate.

Thus, we can conclude that the president's political party and the majority party in the Senate always influence the confirmation of the nominees or their rejection, as the case may be.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/19243990

4 0

3 years ago

Will upvote if answered!!!!!!

pickupchik [31]

The last one.

They feared being discriminated against.

7 0

3 years ago