The nation that has the absolute advantage in peanuts is India.
<h3>How to solve for the absolute advantage of these countries</h3>
a. The country that has the absolute advantage in the pounds of peanuts is India. They are able to produce 10 million worth of the product.
b. This is in the attachment
c. From the calculated opportunity costs, India has been shown to have the comparative advantage in peanuts so they have to specialize here.
The US on the other hand has to specialize in pecans because they have the comparative advantage in it.
d) The PPC for each country is a diagram
e. ) The terms of trade would be a pound of peanut for a pound of pec an for the countries.
Based on this the US would produce 10 units for pecans. They would use 5 units and exchange the remaining 5 units of pecans for 5 units of peanuts from India.
India is also going to do likewise.
Read more on production possibility curve here:
brainly.com/question/2601596
#SPJ1
Answer:
i wish i could help but i desperately need points rn
Explanation:
Answer:bars
Explanation: its primary purpose is the control the movement of the back of the hoof
Answer:
square metres of plant materials required to support the fox = 3650 m²
Explanation:
From the given information:
the daily caloric requirement of the fox = 800
In a year, we have = 800 kcal × 365 /year = 292,000 kcal/year
Also, only 10% of the energy at a particular trophic level can be passed onto the next.
the net productivity of the plant material = 8000 kcal/m²/yr
So, using 10% of energy at a particular level, the fox only need 80 kcal/m²/yr
The objective is to determine in square meters, how many materials are required to support the fox.
square metres of plant materials required to support the fox = 
= 3650 m²
Answer:
The quality of your relationships
Explanation:
Since:
-How much housing costs
-The cost of health care
-Insurance rates you pay
all contribute to the cost of living in the area (since the more you get paid, the more the cost of living is in that area. same with less.)
therefore the quality of relationships does not affect the bottom line: how much is the cost of living. since they are no where near connected.
hope this helps:)
