Answer:
Figure 2 and figure 4
Yes I agree with Tyler
A
C
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Figures 2 and 4 are not slanted which changes the original form, unlike the others.
I agree with Tyler because the size is not only smaller but it says that it was scaled by 2 more centimeters than the original figure.
I believe its the others because the other one is scaled upwards unlike the rest.
We know that
If a tangent segment and a secant segment are drawn to a circle from an exterior point, then the square of the measure of the tangent segment is equal to the product of the measures of the secant segment and its external secant segment. (Intersecting Secant-Tangent Theorem)
so
ST²=RT*QT
RT=7 in
QT=23+7-----> 30 in
ST²=7*30-----> 210
ST=√210-----> 14.49 in
the answer is
RT=14.49 in
Answer:
<h2><u>
y = -2x</u></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
If you notice very carefully then you will see that the line passes through the points :
( 1 , - 2 )
( - 1 , 2 )
Hence the value of x = 1 when the value of y = - 2 .
We know that - 2 × 1 = - 2
⇒ - 2 x = y
⇒ y = - 2x
Hence the first OPTION is correct .
Verification :
For points ( - 1 , 2 ) we can write :
y = - 2x
⇒ 2 = - 2 × - 1
⇒ 2 = 2
Hence the answer is verified .
Always try to use the converse of the graphical method .
( Nothing converse is there ... just saying the opposite steps of that method :P )
I mean in graphical method we plot points and then join , here identify the joined points and then make the equation .
Answer:
nothing can be further done with this topic. please check the expression entered or submit a picture for futher understanding
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 300
Step-by-step explanation: 300+200=500
then 500-200=300
