Because the Jews and Christians where allowed to serve in the government.
Answer:
He was relevant in defending indigenous peoples in Latin America.
The defense assumes that they are free and in their freedom enjoy the natural right.
Explanation:
In the middle of the year 1502-1510 - Friar Bartolomeu de Las Casas leaves for America where he lands with twelve other friars. In this period, Spain is at the beginning of an empire of magnificence, as discussed above, the Arabs are being expelled by the Catholic kings.
Arriving in the land of the natives, the friar Las Casas is enchanted by the kind reception of the Indigenous, but little by little, Bartolomeu realizes the dark side of the Spaniards subsidized only by the greed of gold and silver or other means that could generate precious goods. In the midst of the shadows of greed, however, is a young man full of vitality and with a right intention to evangelize the natives.
The defense assumes that they are free and in their freedom enjoy natural law.
From his point of view, Las Casas would see exceptional indigenous docility as a way of showing human possibilities and qualities, moving from the wild to the civilized way, so evangelizing in the eyes of the religious would not be a process of domination but rather a means of domination. for liberation. In other words, the interplay between two cultures or between two peoples would bring the sum of vast and ennobling experiences to both sides. Therefore, the exchange of experiences would only be possible if there was a mutual adherence of respect, dialogue and otherness that would converge on justice.
The statement best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation is : C) Congress had no way to enforce or interpret the laws it passed, so the Constitution created the executive and judicial branches of the federal government. to put it simply, when the constitution was first made, American people still had no basic experience for running a govenrment, so we made a couple of mistakes that eventually were revised
By not being a social activist. Forcibly pushing an agenda to "change" the views of the people always results in discrimination, hate, and violence. The best way to achieve social change is on a personal level. Forget what is going on the world around you because you cannot change the views of the people around you, you can only change your own views. If you act as an tolerable individual, as a good person, and as a person who believes in treating people as human beings, you will create more of a positive effect than these so called "peaceful" protestors who think it is okay to shut down businesses, institutions, and parades in order to make a point.
True, it all depends on the influence of the King and Queen and on the constitution, because their rules must follow a constitution.
hope this helps
