The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Your question is incomplete. You did not provide the excerpt or any specific reference for the context, the speech, the time, the article, or the book.
However, trying to help you, we did some research and found the following speech. If that is the case, we can comment on the following.
<em>"The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty." </em>(George Washington).
So Washington's main reason for making the statement was that he was worried that the leaders of political parties would act out of self-interest, dividing the nation into factions.
On his final days as United States President, George Washington publicly expressed concern on the issue of political parties. He was against political parties because it could form factions that defended their own particular interests and agendas, and could create an unnecessary division between the citizens of the country.
The two promises of Quran are as follows;
1. If you remember Allah, Allah will remember you
2. If you will follow the Quran, Allah will protect you
Explanation:
Muslims believe that the Quran is the last and supreme book sent by Allah. This book originated about 1400 years ago. Muslims believe that the last of the holy messages sent by God are written in the Quran. These messages originated with Adam. Hazrat Adam was the first Nabi (prophet) in Islamic (and Jewish and Christian) beliefs
<u>Remembrance:</u> If you remember Allah, Allah will remember you
<u>Protection:</u> Quran says that Allah will protect or save you any kind of problem or harm if you follow the Quran in your daily life.
I guessit was russia did.
The correct answer is:
D. Popular soveregnty.
One example of this when was Lewis Cass, the Democratic Party's 1848 presidential nominee, supported popular sovereignty for determining the status of slavery in the United States territories. The party wanted to abolish slavery, because it claimed that it was undemocratic and did not enhance the dignity of work.