Answer:
The boys were running when they fled the scene.
Explanation:
The reason that the two are different is in one of the scenarios, it is implied that the boys had done something to cause the scene. That is why they "fled". If the boys had not been worried, they would have just walked away, like in the second scenario.
S - The children
V - Play
DO - Games
Answer:
b) Appeal to ignorance, present in an argument in which the arguer relies on the supposition that, due to a lack of conclusive evidence, the conclusion of an argument should be accepted.
Explanation:
The logical fallacy of appeal to ignorance is when an argument's conclusion is based on the absence of any evidence proving against it. In other words, an appeal to ignorance is when an arguer relies on the supposition that the lack of any evidence proving otherwise makes his conclusion acceptable and right.
In the given case of the existence of aliens, the speaker decides that <em>"[since] no one has yet been able to [prove that aliens exist]", </em>therefore, it must be true and accepted that <em>"aliens do not exist."</em> This argument follows the logical fallacy of an appeal to ignorance.
Thus, the correct answer is option b.
Answer:
He describes the length of the men’s decision-making process.
Explanation:
First, Grendel explores the world as a child. He notices the world is full of danger and possibility. Then, he undergoes other situations; he is attacked by a bull , so he realises the world is chaotic. He has become an adut as a result of this situation . This chaos makes him ask how a person can survive in such a hostile world. This question leads him to observe how the humans live and he gets attracted by the organization of the human community. He gets interested in this organised system.
Answer:
An armchair.
It has legs but can't walk.
