<em>A speaker’s publicly stated opinion on an issue is called his or her;</em>
A. Stance
<u>A stance is the particular way of thinking about something. It is especially when those opinions are expressed publicly or officially.</u>
During the 15th Century, Western Europe’s social class system comprised the
1. King: The king was the absolute head of the ruling system. The king was in charge of divide the land among the monarchy and the church. Also, he was the one that named lords and knights. Moreover, all the members of the kingdom had to pay the king for the right to use the land through money or goods.
2. Lords: This class was made of powerful landowners and the heads of the church. On the one hand, the king was in charge of providing financial aid to the members of this class. On the other hand, both lords and church members rewarded this help to the king by keeping the population under control and ensuring the loyalty towards him.
3. Knights: They were the last link in the chain of nobility. Basically, they were in charge of ensuring the land control of the lords and of providing military aid to the monarchy.
4. Bourgeoisie: During the 15th Century, a new social class appeared in Europe: the bourgeoisie. This class was neither part of the monarchy nor the church. In fact, the bourgeoisie comprised merchants and agricultural industrials.
5. Peasants: They were the last part of the social class system. Most of the peasants were farmers and worked on the lands that were the property of the king or the lords, for that reason they had to pay for the use of it. Therefore, they lived in extreme poverty.
The correct answer is D) In many cultures, a person's lack of knowledge about history will have an effect on how others will view them.
The statement about history that is not true is "In many cultures, a person's lack of knowledge about history will have an effect on how others will view them."
On the other hand, what is true about history is that the study of history allows for moral contemplation, an investment in the study of history will produce tangible results, and many current and future events will be governed by the past.
History is a very important subject. Through the study of history, we can understand the evolution of humans as groups, communities, societies, states, and nations. How changes forme the society we have today and at what cost. History gives us an identity as individuals and as countries. It helps us to morally contemplate difficult decisions made in the past that were the cause of war, territorial disputes, tyrannic decisions, independence movements, technological advancements, sociological issues, and more.
Hamilton was seen as a person who favored more power obtained by the central government. This means he was in favor of things like a national bank, less state rights, and less of an ability for freed slaves to vote (because federalists were also democrats). Jefferson, on the contrary, was an anti-federalist. He feared that excess central power would infringe on the rights of the states, and so to avoid this, he did as much as he could to retain state rights. He also believed central government authority gave more power to the upper class (wealthy whites) than it did to the common man (poor whites, freed slaves).
Answer:
conflicts often lead to changes. if something happens that you don't like, you would change so it doesn't happen again, etc.
