1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
STALIN [3.7K]
3 years ago
8

Abra ka dabra dibidibi hud​

History
2 answers:
vazorg [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

it's funny

Explanation:

Wow!! Does any Magic occurred...??

mash [69]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A lie is an untruthful assertion. The speaker intends to cause belief in the truth of a statement that the speaker believes to be false. Hence, a lie involves an intention to deceive.

Explanation:

Are you Rajput

I am from India

and you also from india

You might be interested in
which of the following showed that new cultural ideas were growing in the South in the late 1800s? A. The use of Mountain stream
Alika [10]

The correct answer is D)  a new Opera House in Atlanta, Georgia.

<em>What showed that new cultural ideas were growing in the South in the late 1800s was a new Opera House in Atlanta, Georgia.</em>

DeGive's Opera House was the name of the Opera House in Atlanta in the late 1800s. It was the idea of Laurent DeGive, Belgium Consul, that repaired an old building in downtown Atlanta. The presence of this Opera House allowed the spread of a new form of art and cultural ideas in the Southern region, a very important thing for this part of the country after many civil conflicts.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which country is an example of a successful transition to capitalism?
lutik1710 [3]

Singapore...........

3 0
3 years ago
I need the answer in 10 minutes!!!! help!!
bazaltina [42]
Okay, fair warning, Math is not my best subject, but I believe the answer is A, -3/2. Hope I'm right
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the Land Ordinance of 1785 and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 similar?
Nat2105 [25]
They both extended slavery. They both freed enslaved people. They both united the thirteen states. They both encouraged settlement. They both ordinances set aside plots of land for educational purposes. Hope this helps!!!
3 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of human nature and the role government should play
svet-max [94.6K]

Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another.  This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.

John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience.  Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.

Further explanation:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em>  in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who are philosophers
    15·1 answer
  • ________ was largely responsible for getting a series of constitutional amendment proposals passed in the u.s. house of represen
    10·1 answer
  • By the mid-1930s, more than two-
    14·1 answer
  • What was the plight and fight of the following groups?
    6·1 answer
  • Describe the volunteer opportunities that are available during a political campaign
    11·2 answers
  • Which were reasons for US Imperialism? Check all that apply. to acquire more land for building cities to establish naval bases a
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement best completes the diagram culture of western Africa
    15·1 answer
  • Write the word Conquest In an original sentenece. Level 1 and Level 2 sentences are not appropriate
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a result of the demand for labor in the new world?
    9·2 answers
  • From the interview with James bost: he put all his money into a suitcase and he went into the backyard...he dug a large hole....
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!