Negative attitude may hamper attempts to keep the environment clean and habitable to human being through exhibiting improper behaviors such as pollution and improper disposal of waste etc.
<h3>What is Pollution?</h3>
This is defined as the introduction of foreign substances or contaminants into the environment and are of various types such as water pollution etc.
Negative attitude such as smoking in a public place pollutes the air and the oxygen needed to breathe by individuals becomes contaminated which may lead to the risk of contracting various types of diseases.
Read more about Pollution here brainly.com/question/24704410
#SPJ1
well no, as long as its your own child, if its some other child that you see on the street then yes, but if its like i said your own or for instance your helping in a sunday school class,
Split-brain patients have had surgery to cut the corpus callosum. Such a phenomenon was studied and monitored by two neuroscientists Roger Sperry and Michael Gazzaniga. After hard operation, patients felt quite good although the expectations weren't that good. Patients could perform all the activities they did before surgery, that was very surprising and innovational. But after several experiments, doctors discovered side effects and got back to study this process.
Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
