The correct answer is False
Explanation:
Primary sources always reflect the perspective of those who lived or witnessed a specific event; for example, letters written by a soldier in combat about the first world war are considered as a primary source. Therefore, a primary source is a first-hand account, not an interpreted source.
On the other hand, secondary and tertiary sources are those created by others using primary sources or secondary sources, this means they show the interpretation of others, and due to this, information might be inaccurate. This implies secondary and tertiary sources are those that had been interpreted, and therefore the statement is false because primary sources had not been interpreted; also, these are preferred by researches due to this reason.
Hey there, here is my answer:
One time, my grandma made spaghetti and it was the best spaghetti ever. I put the noodles in my mouth and the flavors overwhelmed my mouth. I could taste every flavor. The delicious tomato sauce, the perfectly cooked noodles, the perfect meat, and there was some delicious cheese on top. On the side, there was cheesy garlic bread that melted into my mouth and made my mouth water. I wanted more, and more, and more. My stomach was filled with spaghetti but my mouth wanted to taste the flavors for longer. When I was finished, I was happy, I was content, my world was changed. That bowl of spaghetti changed my life. (This story may be a little overdramatized). Nevertheless, that spaghetti was DELICIOUS.
I hope you enjoyed this story of spaghetti goodness.
It would be irony, because the actions contradict each other severely.<span />
