It was known as the Zipcar concept. Using the social media platform, the business was directly linked to the market. It made them get the edge they wanted to be more popular as their customers get to engage themselves they are already attracting potential clients. Being more popular also equates to added value in the market.
If the standard deviation is 20.98%. The range you should expect to see with a 95 percent probability is: -31.02 percent to +52.9 percent.
<h3>Expected range of return </h3>
Expected range of return = 10.94 percent ± 2(20.98 percent)
Expected range of return =[10.94 percent- 2(20.98 percent)]; [10.94 percent + 2(20.98 percent)]
Expected range of return =(10.94 percent- 41.96 percent); (10.94 percent + 41.96 percent
Expected range of return = -31.02 percent to +52.9 percent
Inconclusion the range of returns is: -31.02 percent to +52.9 percent.
Learn more about expected range of return here:brainly.com/question/25821437
Answer:

Rounded to next whole number:
N=3 kanban card sets
Explanation:
Given:
Number of gauges per hour=D=5 gauges per hour
Gauge cluster housing Transported=C=6
Hours for housing replenishment = T=2 hours
Safety Stock Percentage=P=40%
Find:
Number of kanban card sets needed=N=?
Solution:
Formula According to above mentioned Alphabets


Rounded to next whole number:
N=3 kanban card sets
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer:
produces
increases
trade-offs
Explanation:
The law of increasing opportunity cost states that when firms decide to make additional units of a certain product by reallocating resources, they do that at a higher opportunity cost than the previous production. The major traceable reason for this is inefficiency in resource reallocation.
This increase in opportunity cost is associated with increasing and increasing trade-off.