Answer:
False
Explanation:
If those opposed to women suffrage believed women were incapable, they are making the women suffer by putting words into their mouth, etc.
Please mark brainliest :)
The early Christians were persecuted by the Romans. Christianity worships a single God who sent his Son to save the world. The Romans worshipped many gods, such as Jupiter, Minerva, Juno, etc. they had a god for emotions, food, battle strategy, marriage, victory, the list goes on. The Christians refused to worship these gods in the temples or take part in sacrifices or celebrations for the gods. The emporer Nero was a great persecutor of Christians, he ended up burning their part of the city. Early Christians were punished by floggings. The problems escalated. The Emperors imposed harder punishments. Christians were burned at the stake or fed to wild animals.
Traversing as they do all of Eurasia, the Silk Roads encompassed almost every climate and vegetation zone and crossed every kind of terrain. This sketch of Silk Road geography has the modest aim of introducing a few of the important features of Eurasian physical geography which help us to understand patterns of human habitation and interaction across that vast expanse. There are always regional variations which deserve more detailed treatment. Before the advent of modern technology, geography and ecological zones were critical determinants of where and how people lived, moved and interacted. Boundaries such as we know them, delineated by modern states, did not exist, but boundaries there were, either natural or manmade, and in both cases they turn out to have been quite permeable.
Answer:
The group of officers who is responsible for all positions appointed in the county government consists of mayors, state governor and state representatives.
Explanation:
These people are responsible for appointing workers to hold positions held in county government. These positions are those of free choice, appointment and exoneration, of provisional character, destined to the attributions of direction, leadership and advice, being able to fall or not in effective servant of the State.
Answer:
Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.
-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.
The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.
If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.
