Answer:
Answer is explained in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
Part A: In part a, we are required to show the effects on the financial statements using horizontal statements model.
For that, we need to tabulate the entries properly. So, it cannot be done be done here in the typing section. So, I m putting it into the attachments. Please refer to the attachment for the part a solution.
Part B:
Reason of the difference:
Cash revenue is $8650 but cash flow amount is $9600
Total operating expense incurred is $3350 but the amount paid only $2700
It will create $650 difference income statement and cash flow.
These activities are reasons for the differences between cash flow from the operating activity and net income.
Answer: Assets, net income, and equity overstated.
Explanation: Depreciation can be defined as the decline in value of assets.
A mistake to record depreciation which is the decline in value in asset will significantly affect the account records. If the asset in a financial record is overstated, the net income and equity are also overstated because the asset is used in calculation of net income and equity.
Answer:
the standard of living increased
Explanation:
Between the years 1948 and 1990, the level of productivity in the United States of America increased tremendously, to the extent that it was in the doubled fold. Consequently, this increase in the level of productivity simply exemplified that, there is a substantial increase in the standard of living for the average American.
Hence, it can be concluded that, in this case, the workweek didn't get shorter because "the standard of living increased."
Answer:
solution below
Explanation:
(gain - loss)x35%
for megan
(5500 - 2242) * 35%
= $1140.3 is owed
a.) for megan
(5500-2100)*35%
= $1190
b. for margaret
(4000-2000) x 35%
=$700
c. For melissa,
It doesnt matter if she took this withdrawal at 65 years of age.
d. for morgan
110 - 100 = 10 this is the gain per share
total gain = 10 x 100 = 1000
income tax = 1000 x 0.35 = 350 dollars
e. for murphy,
his income tax would fall by
4000 x35% = 1400.
After this, selling the stock would have no effect on current taxes.
If the government imposes a per-unit tax on sales of an industry's product, then we would expect an increase in the prices of such a commodity and a corresponding drop in demand for it if the product's demand is elastic.
<h3>What is per unit tax?</h3>
Thus, it is right to state that If the government imposes a per-unit tax on sales of an industry's product, then we would expect an increase in the prices of such a commodity and a corresponding drop in demand for it if the product's demand is elastic.
There could also be a drop in the sales or supply of such products all things being equal.
Learn more about taxes at:
brainly.com/question/6427262
#SPJ11
