access to a larger market
This is a benefit of economic globalization since it will open up a wide range of national, regional, and a lot of other markets in which resources, goods, and services as well as information are free-flowing. Every market will therefore have access to the products of various other markets in the whole world.
loss of jobs in developed countries
Economic globalization has led to an improvement in the developing countries. Unfortunately, this had a negative effect on the jobs already available in the developed countries since the decrease of poverty in other developing countries would cause some immigrants to leave their jobs in the developed countries to go back to their homelands, where significant improvement is already seen.
This is therefore a cost of economic globalization.
depletion of natural resources
Economic globalization would encourage markets to produce a lot more compared to the usual situation since they can export their resources to other markets in various places of the world. This would then lead to some markets specializing based on what they have, causing them to utilize their natural resources more frequently.
Depletion of natural resources is therefore a cost of economic globalization.
increase in production of goods
Because of the free-flowing marketplace of goods and services brought by economic globalization, most markets would see a significant increase in the demand of their products. This will lead them to increase their production to meet that demand. Since they can freely export these goods, increasing the production would yield them more profit than usual, thus this will be a benefit of economic globalization.
Image result for The French Revolution (1789) began as a reaction to
The French Revolution began in 1789 and lasted until 1794. King Louis XVI needed more money, but had failed to raise more taxes when he had called a meeting of the Estates General. This instead turned into a protest about conditions in France.
Cited: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/french-revolution/
One very negative consequence of increased feelings of nationalism after WWI was the rise of fascism or so-called national socialism in countries like Germany and Italy. These governments appealed to nationalism and blamed such groups as the Jewish people for their economic problems in the late 20's and early 30's and also believed they had the right to invade and control other countries.
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.
But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.
That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.
So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.
