Answer:
The explanation of that situation is below.
Explanation:
To begin with, the most important factor to have in mind in the situation explained above is the fact that we are talking about a "luxury good" and therefore that when it comes to this type of goods is better when the majority of the people do not possess or at least they must represent the fact that they are exclusive for only some part of the population. That is why that those goods use the strategy of increase always the price because that will means that they are not affordable for the majority of the society but only for a few and that will give to the owner of the good a sense of uniqueness and with that it also comes the sense of superiority. That is why that when it comes to this type of good the analysis change and it collides with the other theory of utility maximation.
Inventory Costs plays a major role in ascertaining working capital requirements as well structuring cash flow statement.
Explanation:
In the given example,
inventory cost 40 percent
Inventory Value $400 million
Ratio of inventory cos ts to inventory value = Inventory Cost / Inventory Value
.
so in the current case it will be 40% x/$400 million
Hence, Inventory Cost 160 Million
Since the cost is fairly on a higher side at 40$ it should try to reduce it which will help in improving its bottom-line.
Company should focus on offering on discounts and promotions and reduce Obsolete Stock.
It should work on restructuring and organizing warehouse costs by prioritizing inventory based on their movements.
The procurement team should order in minimum quantities and benchmark reorder point.
Answer:
Option B. Treasury Stock for $1,200
Explanation:
The reason is that when 1,000 shares which has $2 par value and were issued at $10 per share, the journal entry was:
Dr Cash Account $10,000
Cr Common Stock $2,000
Cr Paid In Capital $8,000
But when 100 shares were repurchased at $12 per share, then the accounting treatment would be
Dr Treasury Stock $1,200
Cr Cash Account $1,200
So the correct option is option B.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the net present value is presented in the attachment below:
For project A, the net present value is $91,771.53 and for project B, the net present value is $79,390.69
It is computed after considering the discounting factor that comes from
= 1 ÷ (1 + discount rate)^number of years
for year 1, it is
= 1 ÷ (1 + 0.06)^1
The same applied for the remaining years
Answer:
Task a:
The answer is $24,500.
Task b:
The answer is 17%
Explanation:
<h2>Task a:</h2><h3>What is the maximum amount of new capital that can be raised at the LOWEST component cost of EQUITY?</h3><h3>Solution:</h3>
We already know the following:
Projected net income = $21,000
Payout ratio = 30%
Retention ratio = 70%
Debt share = 40%
Equity share = 60%
Maximum amount of capital to be raised at the lowest component cost of equity = Projected net income ×
= $21,000 × 
= $24,500
<h3>Answer:</h3>
The maximum amount of new capital that can be raised at the lowest component of equity is $24,500.
<h2>Task b:</h2><h3>What is the component cost of equity by selling new common stock?</h3><h3>Solution:</h3>
k(e) (component cost of external equity) = [Dividend (D0)(1 + growth) / stock price(1 - flotation cost)] + growth
Formula:
k(e) = 
+ 0.05
Where
Do = $2.00
G = 0.05
P = $21/88
= ($2.00(1 + 0.05) / $21.88(1-.20)) + 0.05
= ($2.10/$21.88(1-.20)) + 0.05
= ($2.10/$21.88(0.80) + 0.05
= 0.17 or 17%
<h3>Answer: </h3>
The component cost of equity by selling new common stock = 17%
