Answer: Hello, I can give you some summarys but i dont know if it wold help so.......
Explanation: Shortly after Herbert’s execution, Stevenson visits death row to catch up with several new clients, including Walter. Afterward, he travels to Monroeville to meet Walter’s large extended family. Gathered together in a small trailer, they passionately explain to Stevenson their indignation at Walter’s conviction, particularly when they were all with him at the time of the murder. Stevenson writes that the family’s hums of agreement were the kind of “wordless testimony of struggle and anguish” he heard “all the time growing up in a rural black church.” Walter’s sister Armelia expresses that the court’s dismissal of Walter’s alibi makes her feel that she has been “convicted too.” A debate arises about whether or not Walter, whom they call “Johnny D”, even needed an alibi, given his upstanding character.
If you are telling us to revise the sentence, one error is that there is a double negative. 'not' and 'un' would cancel each other, and the revised sentence 'I wouldn't say he's the nicest guy around, but I've seen him behave kindly before.'
The argument that is most likely to have influenced the dissent of the Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands to school is A. The Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to the fundamental rights of a person that is protected by law to make his own choices.
Hence, we can see that based on the original decision by the lower courts, they said the school was right to suspend the students, but the main argument that overturned this decision is that fact that the Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
Read more about human rights here:
brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
