Answer: d) Employees have considerable legal protection against surveillance.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question, for finding those employees who are stealing money from the bank , bank can set up cameras to observe their activities with informing them.
Bank can also observe the use of internet done by employee on bank monitors to know about their activity on internet and tracking any suspicious event.Bank can also read employees emails to know about the sources from where they are sending an receiving the mails from.
The only incorrect step would be employees taking lawful protection from getting surveillanced as this would not help in tracing the culprit of stealing money.
This the correct option is option(d).
By ringing the bell making The dog drool with the food
The book of the bible that deals most thoroughly with Christ's priesthood is Hebrews
Answer: Pre-authorization
Explanation:
Managed care plan is the plan that contains insurance about the medical facilities and health care that is provided to an individual by health care providers. This plan is provided to people at low costs through providers and the services of healthcare is also at low amount.
Pre-authorization is the prior approval that is provided by the health insurer that the particular medical services and care will be provided to the individual under the plan.
If this pre-certification is not obtained in managed care plan then this can lead to the reduction in plan's medical care coverage or no coverage at all in healthcare field.
Answer:
The correct answer is b) for a new trial.
Explanation:
When talking about a new trial, it refers to the legal requirement that the lawyer of the party affects that does not agree with the opinion of the judge.
When a new trial is requested, the lawyer files the appeal requesting a change of jury or judge, usually in the new trials, no new evidence can be presented.
This is why the claims are generally based on situations of law and not fact, such as asking for an appeal because he believes the jury did not take all the evidence into account or because the judge did not see all the facts.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
