1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Assoli18 [71]
3 years ago
11

What factors made the tang capital of chang’an a center of culture and trade select all that apply

Social Studies
1 answer:
Vesna [10]3 years ago
5 0

In the period of the Sui Dynasty (581-618 AD), Chang’an before was named Daxing. However, in a later time, the city got new reformations and innovations and was renamed Chang’an by the Tang dynasty administrators which then served as the Tang capital until its collapse in 904 AD.

This ancient imperial capital was the eastern commencement point of the Silk Road. The Silk Road has been of an enormous importance to the trade and cultural exchange to Xi’an (formerly Chang’an) as well as important crossroads for people from entire China, middle east, Rome, and Central Asia.  The city thus developed into a hub of diverse ethnic recognition and religious beliefs.

In addition to the above, the tang dynasty manifested a tremendous cultural and religious fluorescence when it grew into a Buddhist learning center and also Taoism, attracting many pilgrims, and other scholars as well as philosophers. This didn’t end only with Buddhism, many other faith denominations emerged such as Nestorian Christianity, Zoroastrianism and Manichaeism, and later Islam.

therefore, the factors that made the tang cipital of Chang'an a center of culture and trade were mainly A and C; It welcomed foreigners and their beliefs, it was located at one end of the silk Road.

You might be interested in
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
Workplace ethics refers to the way employees in an organization govern themselves and their overall work attitude.
34kurt

This is true. Workplace ethics refers to the way employees in an organization govern themselves and their overall work attitude.

<h3>What is workplace ethics?</h3>

This is the term that has to do with the way that the people that work in an organization would govern themselves and the way that they behave in the workplace.

It tells us the morality that exists in the workplace or it could also refer to the lack of morality that exists in the organization. Hence we can conclude that Workplace ethics refers to the way employees in an organization govern themselves and their overall work attitude.

Read more on ethics here: brainly.com/question/13969108

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
The extent to which a society values individual freedom and independence of action compared with a tight social framework and lo
allochka39001 [22]

The correct answer is 2

Explanation: Individualism can be employed in two different ways. The former is not synonymous and is generally used in opposition to collectivism.

5 0
3 years ago
Ok what three oceans surround Asia
satela [25.4K]
The three oceans that surround Asia are: The Pacific ocean, Arctic ocean, and the Indian ocean.

I know this because I looked on a world map, and checked Google.

Hope I helped!

- Amber
3 0
3 years ago
Write one paragraph explaining the similarities between a refugee and an immigrant.
Kay [80]

<h2>What is an immigrant?</h2>

<h3>An immigrant is someone who chooses to resettle to another country.</h3>

<h3>The United States has a legal process for that immigrant to seek legal residency and eventually citizenship.</h3>

<h3>Many immigrants, however, don't have such legal status and are thus undocumented. As such, they are subject to "removal" or deportation from the United States.</h3>

<h3>There are 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States -- a problem that has led Democrats and Republicans alike to declare the U.S. immigration system as "broken." Congress has been deadlocked for years on how to reform immigration laws.</h3>

<h3>"Migrants, especially economic migrants, choose to move in order to improve the future prospects of themselves and their families," the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees says. "Refugees have to move if they are to save their lives or preserve their freedom."</h3>

<h2>What is a refugee?</h2>

<h3>A refugee is someone who has been forced to flee his or her home country.</h3>

<h3>As such, refugees can apply for asylum in the United States, a process that could take years.</h3>

<h3>Getting refugee status isn't easy.</h3>

<h3>The applicants have to prove that if they return to their home country, they'll be injured because of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or their political opinion.</h3>

<h3>"Refugees are generally people outside of their country who are unable or unwilling to return home because they fear serious harm," the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services says.</h3>

<h3>The Central Americans overwhelming the U.S.-Mexican border are Hondurans, Guatemalans and Salvadorans. Many are fleeing drug- and gang-fueled violence back home.</h3>

<h3>Is the violence -- any kind -- grounds for a refugee claim? Not necessarily.</h3>

<h3>The violence has to be targeted to a person specifically, and that's where things get complicated. Every case is different, and because of a law signed by President George W. Bush in 2008, children fall into a special class.</h3>

<h3>The William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Action Act, named after a 19th century British abolitionist, is designed to crack down on the global child slave trade. The U.S. law ensured that children who came to the country got a full immigration hearing instead of being turned away or sent back. The hearing would determine whether the children had a valid claim for asylum.</h3>

<h3>The law is now cited as one cause behind a projected 90,000 children from Central America and Mexico who will cross the U.S. border alone or with other children this year, a huge increase over the 39,000 that the Border Patrol detained last year.</h3>

<h3>Asylum is a protection available to people who are already in the United States or are seeking admission at the U.S. border.</h3>

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Katie is conducting a within subjects design. Her independent variable has 2 levels that must occur 1 week apart. In the first s
    13·1 answer
  • What did King Ferdinand and Queen Isabela do as part of the Reformation?
    5·1 answer
  • Why where the liberated countries so unstable
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following assets is most liquid? Least liquid? •Marketable securities•Accounts receivable•Inventories•Accounts paya
    8·1 answer
  • The Middle East has some of the world’s largest reserves of __________.
    13·2 answers
  • Crashes and near-crashes have been observed to ________ when teen drivers are reaching for a cell phone and to ________ when the
    5·1 answer
  • ACROSS<br><br> 7. a person in the South who rooted for<br><br> the North at the end of the Civil War
    14·1 answer
  • Following the wourld war
    8·2 answers
  • In your own words what is the structure of earth
    15·2 answers
  • Identify the trend shown by the data *
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!