Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
Losing in olympic games where the US dominates but still chokes
The catholic counter-reformation was the church's response to the events of the protestant reformation. Thousands of people flocked to new Protestantism, leaving the catholic church behind. The catholic church decided to try and reform the church from within. Hope this answer helps. (:
Answer: the answer is: American Indians are not civilized or educated in the ways of the world.
Explanation: I just answered it
The answer to your question is A
