Laws passed through congress have a direct impact on the court system, since it changes the way courts have to rule on the law. The Supreme court allows the court system to have some say in what laws are just by appealing their agreement with the constitution. The President doesn't directly pass laws, he has the power to veto congressional laws and through his endorsement behind them, but doesn't actually have the power to write, create or pass new laws himself, even if he's the one who technically signs them into law. As such, the supreme court checks the president less often than congress, because the president's actions affect the court's sphere of interest less often. Most interaction between the president and the court happen when the President heavily endorses a bill, gets it passed through congress, and then the court checks it. Some great examples are the Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the National Recovery Administration, which were created through bills sponsored by Franklin Roosevelt as part of his New Deal reforms. The court struck them down as unconstitutional for various reasons, much to the dismay of FDR. In modern times, Obamacare almost had it's individual mandate requirement stuck down by the court a few years ago and elements of President Trump's muslim travel ban were struck down by the supreme court just in the last month.
Answer:
The British soldiers were looking for weapons that the colonist had hidden there.
Answer:
To reduce soft money contributions to political parties.
it has caused spending by interest groups to increase
Explanation:
giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech:
in "citizen united v fec" the supreme court said because corporations giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech and the government cant restrict it. giving money is protected under the first amendment
Soft money is unregulated donations to political parties for general "party-building" purposes, not the support of a particular candidate so it avoid various legal limitations
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act aka McCain-Feingold Act is a major amendment of the Federal Election Campaign Act 1971 passed by the US congress in 2002. Its goal was to reduce the increased use of soft money to fund advertising by political parties.
brainly.com/question/11364371
investopedia
wikipedia
Compare: They both were fighting to gain and improve rights for African Americans
Contrast:
1863:
The purpose of the march was to advocate for the civil and economic rights of African Americans.
1941:
This march was designed to pressure the U.S. government into desegregating the armed forces and providing fair working opportunities for African Americans.
Answer:
C. The Caddo lived in dome-shaped huts built from timber
Explanation:
Their Dome-Shaped huts were made from Grass, not Timber.
They supported the dome using long wooden poles as the foundation and covered with dry grass to serve as its Roof and walls. During winter, they often covered the foundation with thick layer of clay to provide protection from the cold weather.
Typically, each of their dome-shaped huts were large enough for 20-30 people to live in. But one hut is usually used by no more than two-three families.
