The technology that we have versus theirs
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>B. Akbar
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Akbar was one of the most appreciated kings of the mighty Mughal Empire. He was known to be a king who tolerated other religions than Islam. He tried his best to win the affection of his people and tried to support all kinds of religious beliefs and rituals. He even authorised the construction of several temples, during his reign. During his rule, the Hindus were allowed to hold ranks in the empire. He believed in the policy of inclusion.
Answer: The invasion of Spain by Napoleon
Explanation:
Answering the question by the user in the first comment.
As was the case in most of their colonies, the Europeans practised classism in Latin America and perpetuated a social order where various classes of people were placed in positions on a social hierarchy based on race.
A lot of people resented this and began to spread revolutionary ideas around the continent but could take no real action as they would be repressed by the Spanish army.
This changed in 1808 when Napoleon invaded Spain. To the Latin American revolutionaries, this showed that Spain had become weak and so they took advantage of the situation and launched widespread rebellion against their Spanish rulers.
Explanation:
The United States Civil Rights Act of 1964, named in English Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Congressional Law 88-352, 78 United States Statutes at Large 241, enacted on July 2, 1964) is a historic civil and labor law for that country, which was a key piece to prohibit racial discrimination and racial segregation. The Law established a series of mandatory rules for voter registration in the states of the Union, in order to guarantee the right to vote of all citizens and avoid the arbitrariness that in some southern states were used to prevent the vote of The African American population. It also established mandatory rules throughout the country, so that no owner of public access establishments or services (parks, theaters, restaurants, public transport, stadiums, hotels, etc.) could discriminate against people or segregate them on the grounds of "race, color, religion or national origin ", considering that such actions constituted a criminal offense. In education, the law established a procedure to" desegregate "public education and ensure that ethnic differences do not affect equal educational opportunities.1 In labor matters, the law established that it would be considered "illegal employment", any hiring, dismissal or treatment in employment, which implies a discrimination based on "race, color, religion, sex, or national origin" (years later it would be added age over 40 years), establishing a summary procedure to punish the offense and restore the affected worker in the position of work from which he was excluded. Finally, the law created the Commission for Equal Employment Opportunities (EEOC).
Answer:
Jews were discrimnated and sent to camps with no ties to showing threats against the Germans or anyone at that. The Japanese Americans were seen as a threat because people of their ethnic background bombed the pearl harbor. So you can see that people had a reason of being fearful in america while the jews gave no reason for people to fear them.
Explanation:
Jews were imprisoned in camps and discriminated against through hate from people that were brainwashed or forced to believe that Jews were a threat by Hitler. While in America the Japanese were sent to camps and discriminated against because people of their ethnic background threatened Americans with the acting of bombing Pearl Harbor.
