Answer:
The strategy that would be least effective in reducing the company's criminal liability is:
D. It could donate to the election campaigns of the new members of Congress to establish goodwill.
Explanation:
While the other three options will effectively reduce the company's criminal liability exposure, option D is the least that is likely to have a positive or effective effect. This implies that option D is most likely to aggravate the criminal liability of the company as it will be regarded as bribery to cover up a crime.
Hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Answer:
If a CPA does an audit irresponsibly, the CPA will be held liable to third parties who were recognized and not foreseeable to the CPA for gross negligence.
It needs to be specified if the third party had been “anticipatable,” liability; it may be recognized for ordinary negligence within a Rosenblum v. Adler decision.
Explanation:
Answer:
1693.25
Explanation:
The computation of the current price of the item and the price 9 years from today is shown below:-
p(t) = 1,200 × (1.039)^t
Now, the current price can be found by putting t = 0
p(0) is

The price 10 years from today
p(9) is

Now we will solve the above equation
= 1,200 × 1.411041958
= 1693.25035
or
= 1693.25
I don’t understand this question