Answer:
The controlling idea of the text is that Simon Schama thinks and believes that William Shakespeare and the question of his authorship for some of his famous works of art is a question that needs no authenticity. Though some may believe that he is not capable of producing such 'famous works' considering his upbringing and education, his life experiences and 'imaginative creativity' helped him become who he was and is more than most of us too.
Explanation:
The controlling idea of any text is the opinion or the direction in which the author is taking the argument forward. This means that it contains the personal opinion and feelings of the writer about the topic of the text.
In the essay "The Shakespeare Showdown," author Simon Schama presents his opinion that there are many who question the authenticity of numerous literary texts that were written by William Shakespeare. Some even pointed out that Shakespeare is not 'intelligent' enough to have written them. But Simon believes that Shakespeare is indeed capable of writing those contested works.
While some may opine that <em>"[Shakespeare's] cultural provenance was too lowly, and his education too rudimentary, to have allowed him to penetrate the minds of kings and courtiers"</em>, there is no doubt that his <em>"capacity for imaginative extension was socially limitless",</em> thus helping him become who he is today. And in the words of William Hazlitt, <em>"He was nothing in himself, but he was all that others were, or that they could become."
</em>
Thus, the controlling idea of this text is that Shakespeare was and is indeed someone capable of authoring those 'contested' books and is more too.
The question requires a personal answer, about your interpretation of the text. In that case, I can't write your answer, but I'll show you how to do it.
Your question refers to the text "auto-concept" written by Saul McLeod. In this case, the first step to answering this question is to read this text and understand the concepts presented in it.
The text presents the three components of the self-concept and how they are established in an individual's life and his/her perception of himself or herself.
These components were explained by Carl Rogers as self-image, self-esteem, and the ideal self.
<h3>O que os componentes da autoimagem representam?</h3>
- Self-image: The view that the individual has of himself.
- Self-esteem: The value that the individual gives to himself.
- Ideal Self: The way the individual would like to be.
In this case, to answer your questions, you must decide which of these components is more convincing and less convincing for your interpretation of the text.
In addition, you must determine whether Carl Roger's conceptualization of these components is effective.
Learn more about Carl Roger at the link:
brainly.com/question/14018413
The correct answer is "complex" sentence.
This is correct because it consists of two clauses, one independent and one subordinate, in which the subordinate clause conveys no meaning as it only shows at which time did a certain action occur.
Hi. You did not provide the phrases this question refers to. This makes it impossible for me to answer your question efficiently. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
Context clue is a literary device that allows the reader to understand the meaning of a difficult or unknown word through the context of the sentence where it is inserted or the context of the text itself.
This context clue will be called definition clue when the phrase presents the meaning of the word in its composition. Ex: Uma Haberdashery, which is a men's clothing store, opened next to my mother's restaurant.
The context clue will be called example clue when the phrase presents examples to explain the unknown word. Ex: My mother could not stand people who behave in an obsequious way, like my sister who was full of flattery in relation to her boss.
The context clue will be called synonym clue when the unknown word is explained subjunctively within the sentence. Ex: My mom was happy when the new haberdashery opened because she needed to buy a new suit for my dad.
The context clue will be called antonym clue when the meaning of an unknown word is determined by the presentation of another word or a clause that presents the opposite of that word. Ex: But my mom was sad that she couldn't buy women's clothes in this store, as it was a haberdashery.
"Love is to Life as Music is to Man." Music can be survived without in a biological sense. But what is there to life when there's no expression? No depth? I think it develops an emptiness after awhile. The absence of Music in Man creates an analytical void, nothing more. When there is Music though, there is passion, there is an expression to things and of things. Whether it's a person, or a tree, or anything, or nothing - it's a solid and liquid something that exists that is far more that explainable. It is a visible, less understood substance that fills Man with purpose and feeling. Like Love, it can pursued, created, forgotten about, taken away, and it gives to Life what Music gives to Man.
