1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kaheart [24]
3 years ago
15

Should people without power use violence to make a change??

History
2 answers:
labwork [276]3 years ago
6 0
Violence often diminishes the power of those who employ it, necessitating the use of more violence in an attempt to gain or maintain control. Power and violence are not the same. ... Violence rarely creates power. In fact, groups or individuals that use violence often find their actions diminish what power they do have.
sp2606 [1]3 years ago
4 0
It depends. You should first use means that aren’t drastic. Meaning you should kindly fight for the right to make a change. I don’t believe you should use violence tho. Violence when used to make a change can cause greed after u get that change.
You might be interested in
How did the Constitution fix the problems of the Articles of Confederation? Use at least one of the following principles in a pa
liberstina [14]
<span>The Articles of Confederation were established to govern the new country, with a weak executive power. It didn't take long before disputes between states and other matters caused them to rethink their plan and develop the US Constitution, with a more powerful executive branch (US President).
hope it helps
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Which factor contributed most tthe growth of the middle class?
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

"The lure of new, high-paying, high-skill manufacturing jobs"

Explanation:

Towards the end of the 1800s, the United States of American economy moved or transitioned away from agriculture to an industrial economy.

It's evident through many railroad construction and the western territory expansion which led to more jobs, business, and manufacturing of goods.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Octavian do to demonstrate that the Roman Republic had been given a "fresh start"? What actions did he previously take
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Octavian demonstrated that the roman republic had been given a fresh start by overhauling the social and political facets of Roman life and freeing them from the dictatorship of Julius Caesar and  this led to  peace and prosperity throughout the Greek and roman world.

Augustus Octavian

  Emperor Augustus whose original name was Gaius Octavius was the first Roman emperor, after the fatal destruction of the Roman empire by the reign of  Julius Caesar, who was his great-uncle and adoptive father.

    During his reign,  he demonstrated that the Roman empire had been given a fresh start from the dictatorial ruler ship of Julius Caesar he overhauled every facet of Roman life and introduced   peace and prosperity to the Greek/Roman world.

      The ultimate source of Augustus Octavian's  power was the Roman army. He confidently divided the number of legions and assigned veterans in colonies, which helped solidify Roman rule in distant provinces and consolidate the empire.

Learn more about Octavian at brainly.com/question/893934

7 0
2 years ago
What was part of President Nixon's plan of "peace with honor"?
Leno4ka [110]

"Peace with Honor" was uttered by U.S. President Richard M. Nixon on January 23, 1973 to describe the Paris Peace Accord that helped end the Vietnam War. The treaty specified that a ceasefire would take place four days later. It was stipulated there that the North Vietnamese would release all U.S. prisoners, and all U.S. troops would withdraw from South Vietnam.

So the closest answer is (A) An exchange of prisoners of war with North Vietnam.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one major result of the battle of antietam answers?
ryzh [129]
This unexpected Northern win gave Lincoln the credibility to issue the Emancipation Proclamation without making it look like a desperate measure.The Proclamation made it ethically impossible for Britain to aid the Confederates - a most significant outcome.The battle also spelt the end for McClellan.Although he had won the battle, he failed to pursue and destroy the Army of Northern Virginia, which the whole of Lincoln's cabinet thought he should have <span>done, and he was promptly replaced by Burnside.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was a difference between immigrants who arrived in the united states during the 1840's and the 1850's and the 'new' immigra
    14·2 answers
  • We hear much of special interest groups. Well, our concern must be for a special interest group that has been too long neglected
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the role of the Food and Drug Administration in American life.
    5·1 answer
  • What were the major events that occurred during the Holocaust, and how did they impact targeted groups?
    15·2 answers
  • 17th-century Dutch art centered on genre scenes, landscapes, portraits of middle-class men and women, and still lifes, all of wh
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement about the Korean War is true? The Soviet Union sent troops to fight alongside North Korea's army. South Korea su
    5·2 answers
  • Thomas Jefferson borrowed from the Social Contract, written by Jean-Jacques
    12·2 answers
  • How many Soviet citizens died as a result of WWII?
    11·1 answer
  • Where did France rule and what was it called?
    8·1 answer
  • True or false: Unconquerable is being control of what to do​
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!