d
Explanation:
im pretty sure its timely
By using figurative language, Shakespeare creates a visual image of Octavius’ army overtaking them like inescapable death. Cassius’ words foreshadow later events in act 5.
No, they are not equivalent fractions. 200/100 is an improper fraction, meaning that the numerator(or the top number) is larger than the denominator(the bottom number). 1/5 is a normal, simplified fraction...200/100 at its simplest is 2/1. Therefore, like I said before, they are not equivalent
Well, it’s bad luck to say the title “Macbeth” within a theatre space, so you could start with setting that rule down. Also, you could go about it the way that Orwell did in “Animal Farm,” using different characters and settings to relay the same plot. For example, Orwell used barnyard animals to represent the communists. You could use Trump as an example because he was a “nobleman” who schemed to gain power. Something like that?
