The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not attach any text or specific reference, so we are going to answer is the following general terms.
One way in which commercial extraction of raw materials in Egypt was different from the commercial extraction of raw materials in the Amazon in the period 1750-1900, was the following.
The commercial extraction of raw materials in Egypt was basically the product of the British colonization efforts in that part of North Africa. Great Britain had several colonies in Africa, one of them being Egypt. More than colonizing the territory to help people to develop and grow, the reality was that the English monarchy just wanted to exploit those raw materials and natural resources. And exploit they did.
In the case of the Amazon forest, European nations such as Portugal did something similar but they instilled the concept of latifundium, wealthy people that owned the land and forced slaves to work, produce, and harvest the crops that were exported to be industrialized.
Answer:
United States of america was the fast and growing country around the 20th century
Explanation:
Answer: Many decades earlier they had chosen a destiny alongside canada, rather than as a part of it.The tow countries adopted self government under the british crown.
B. It helped the economy.
In fact, it was not until the end of the World War I that the US began to be considered as a world super economic power. The reason after that is that by staying neutral the US supplyed and selled weapons and war equipment to both parties of the conflict, getting profit out of it.
