Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer: by instructing his teams to create mission statements with clearly defined goals
Explanation:
These are the options:
A. by dismantling the teams so he can make one goal for the entire facility
B. by instructing his teams to create mission statements with clearly defined goals
C. by making all employees trade jobs for several weeks so they have more in common
D. by increasing the dependence of the teams on each other so all tasks share common goals
E. by giving each worker a set amount of time to find out what their goals should be or face discipline
From the question, we will realize that Donovan learned that just few of the workers in the company share any sense of common goals within teams as there was He notes disparity in what the workers were doing and the goals to be accomplished.
Based on the above scenario, he should instruct his team to create mission statement that has clearly defined goals. The mission statement will show the reason for the existence of the organization, the goal of the organization, the kind of product or service rendered etc. This will help the workers know what is expected from all of them and work towards it.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option D, Legal Market for a market price that is lower.
Explanation:
If there is a store which sells the goods at the market price even though the government authorities have set the minimum price that can be charged, it means store is selling the product at a price which is higher than the minimum price set by the government, but it doesn't mean that the store owner is doing any illegal trading. This is because the government has set the lower price limit but that ceiling price is non binding. It is not necessary for the market sellers to sell at the price given by government. So they are operating in a legal market for a market price that is lower.
