In the "On Women's Right to Vote" speech, the evidence Anthony use to argue that women should be allowed to vote is preamble to the constitution.
During the 1800s, women were denied the right to vote and many other rights that were extended to men. Susan B. Anthony, a prominent Women’s rights movement leader with Elizabeth Cady Stanton established the National Women’s Suffrage Association, which advocated for women right of voting. Anthony voted in the presidential election in November 1872 and was arrested. Following her indictment, Anthony gave her famous “On Women’s Right to Vote” speech. She invoked the preamble to the constitution, pointing that it addresses We, the people, and not We, the male citizens. Hence, she argued that as women are among the people, they should have voting rights.
Learn more about “On Women’s Right to Vote” speech:
brainly.com/question/1814896
#SPJ4
A suffix
Suffix is at the end of a word but prefixes are at the beginning of the word.
It makes the family happy and more coloration trying to take care of pets and loving them thuy can become each other best friend and help each other out and keep em safe especially when their is someone in their house protection b
Based on the contents of sentence 4, the appeal used by the speaker was an appeal to emotions.
<h3>When is an appeal to emotions used?</h3>
An appeal to emotions is said to be used when the speaker tries to evoke feelings from the listeners.
In sentence 4, the speaker appears to use an appeal to emotions by trying to get the listener to feel sympathy for the students going through stress.
Find out more on appeals to emotion at brainly.com/question/540796.
#SPJ1
The correct answer is “Globalization can cause confusion and discomfort as people adjust to different, often conflicting, cultural values and expectations.”
Indeed, the excerpt shows that Globalization causes confusion both for the host society and the immigrants. In this situation, the teacher lacks the cultural contextual information to understand that this Bengalese family is referring to their custom of having a school name for students. She is asking probing questions to try to understand if this is a middle name or a nickname.
The Bengalese parents seem to either lack the humility or the patience to explain exactly why they mean and provide her with the context she needs to understand their request. Another possibility is that they lack the education or linguistic tools to properly explain this.
Incomprehension goes both ways, had they been able or willing to explain this, the teacher would have been able to explain to them that their child can use a second school name in a personal context and have his friends and other students refer to him by such name but that with regards to academic records, American laws prohibit such practices as these records must match the exact legal identity of the student.
