Answer:
Ecological Validity
Explanation:
According to my research on different research methodology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this study is lacking in Ecological Validity. This refers to to the extent to which the findings of a research study are able to be generalized to real-life settings. This is because like mentioned in the question this study is addressing a situation that does not happen in everyday life therefore it cannot be generalized to a real-life settings.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:b. There is no way to filter out all illegal content but still allow access to constitutionally protected materials.
Explanation:
Sometimes trying to filter out negative content may require extensive filtering which may even prevent access to materials which are useful and actual protected because filtering may include exception of certain words for example which shouldn't appear when one searches the internet however those word may also be used in a protected information which doesn't carry explicit and harmful information so it end up being difficult to filter these words out.
Answer: Passive solar technology
Explanation:
Passive solar technology is the method of using materials to attract sunlight for warmth. Solar energy is the energy that comes from the sun. To store this energy gotten from the sun you'll need some elements to transfer this energy then store them. According to the passage the individual used a black material (black material is used for conveying and storing heat, it's one of the best form for doing so), the black material and the water helps warm the water needed for the individual after his hiking which actually worked.
Answer:
Capitalism.
Explanation: Last time someone tried anything else, Russia ended up with Lenin, and China got Mao Zhedong. I'll take my flipping chances with this mess of a country any day.
Answer:
<em>Research </em>is a <em>process of generating new knowledge about a specific subject by acquiring new information, analyzing it and putting it into the framework of existing knowledge in order to make new conclusions.
</em>
Let us take as an <u>example </u>the salient issue of electronic cigarettes. Being on the market in many countries for several years now, e-cigarettes have both their supporters and opposers. Some people <u>claim</u> that e-cigarettes is a good alternative to smoking tobacco and while they can be harmful they are less harmful than tobacco. Some people share an <u>opinion</u> that e-cigarettes are dangerous and should be banned.
Only <u>research </u>can educate both of these opinions with validated scientific outcomes. That is why so many institutions are currently running extensive research on the impact of e-cigarettes on human health. Until robust scientific data is collected, which takes a lot of time with subjects that are expected to have a long-term effect on human health, ideas in favor or against will prevail the agenda on this subject. Moreover, the lack of research can result in fear mongering <u>ideas</u> about e-cigarettes, or opposite to that, fashion to use e-cigarettes among people who were not smoking tobacco before.
