1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anastassius [24]
3 years ago
6

6. Solve the equation *x + 3 ={x +3

Mathematics
2 answers:
Arlecino [84]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

x=4

Step-by-step explanation:

Zina [86]3 years ago
5 0
Well the answer for the photo is 5/2
You might be interested in
How can you quickly determine the number of roots a polynomial will have by looking at the equation?
Alika [10]
Suppose we have a generic polynomial of the form:
 ax ^ 2 + bx + c

 To know how many roots the polynomial can have, the first thing you should do is observe the term of greatest exponent.
 For this case, the term of greatest exponent is 2.
 Therefore, the polynomial has 2 roots.
 Answer:
 
You must observe the term of the polynomial with greater exponent.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
If f(x)=|3x-4|+2 find f(-10)
Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

f(-10)=36

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=|3x-4|+2\\f(-10)=|3(-10)-4|+2\\f(-10)=|-30-4|+2\\f(-10)=|-34|+2\\f(-10)=34+2\\f(-10)=36

Rgds!

6 0
3 years ago
peter went to a store. he bought 5.20 Ibs. of jelly beans and cherries. if 3.24 Ibs. we're jelly beans, how many pounds were che
Allisa [31]
1.96
you just gotta do 5.20-3.24, have a good day. Hope this helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The United States has a total area of 3,796,742 square miles.
Dvinal [7]

Answer:

4 * 10^6

Step-by-step explanation:

3,796,742 is about 4,000,000

4 * 10^? = 4,000,000

4 to 4,000,000 is an extra 6 zeroes

? = 6

4 * 10^6

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the value of the function y = 2x + 3 ⁢when <br> x=−1<br> ?
    14·2 answers
  • F(x)= -2x + 2; Find f(5)
    15·1 answer
  • OF Bisects EOG. M EOF = y+ 30 and M FOG = 3y - 50. Solve for y
    15·1 answer
  • A number is doubled and then six is added. When this is divided by four, the result is eleven.
    10·2 answers
  • What is the median set data for 4,2,7,5,4,12,8
    6·1 answer
  • Find x. Please help with this problem!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Expand to write and equivalent expression: 4/5(5k-12d)
    13·1 answer
  • Which equation has no solution
    15·1 answer
  • The quotient of x and 9 is greater than 27
    5·1 answer
  • The triangles are congruent by SSS or HL.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!